Welcome Guest

rescissions cannot be enacted through a reconciliation bill.

Posted on: May 29, 2025 at 11:00:39 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
145317
Member For:
20.89 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
5
The reconciliation process is primarily designed for changes in mandatory spending, revenues, or the debt limit, not for enacting or rescinding discretionary funding. Discretionary spending, which is subject to the annual appropriations process, is typically not addressed through reconciliation.

Purpose of Reconciliation:
Reconciliation is a special legislative process that allows Congress to pass certain budget-related legislation with simplified procedures, often avoiding filibusters. It's used for changes to mandatory spending (like Medicare, Social Security), revenues (like taxes), and the debt limit.

Discretionary Funding:
Discretionary funding, on the other hand, is controlled through the annual appropriations process, which is how Congress decides how much money to allocate to various government programs.

Byrd Rule:
The Senate's Byrd rule (Section 313 of the Budget Act) further restricts reconciliation by prohibiting the inclusion of extraneous provisions, including those that don't affect spending or revenues.

Rescissions and Reconciliation:
While nothing in the Budget Act explicitly prohibits including provisions to rescind discretionary funding in a reconciliation bill, the restrictions on reconciliation, including the Byrd rule, make it impractical for this purpose.

Alternative to Rescission:
If Congress wants to eliminate discretionary funding, they would typically need to pass a separate appropriations bill or amendment that reduces the funding.

https://www.cbpp.org/research/introduction-to-budget-reconciliation#:~:text=Mandatory%20spending%20is%20determined%20by,%E2%80%9D%20questions%20below%20for%20more.)
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     One thing I will credit the Dems with; When it comes to - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/29 11:26:40
     MAGA retards will defend literally anything Trump does - Columbian Gold MU - 5/29 11:06:07
          The bill doesn't raise the national debt - MU Diaspora MU - 5/29 11:53:57
               LOl the level of disinformation from your ilk - JG A - 5/29 13:02:20
                    You're bad at math - MU Diaspora MU - 5/29 14:07:43
               It may not raise the deficit - meatiger MU - 5/29 12:03:53
               You believe the bill will not result in a deficit in FY26? (nm) - haeffb MU - 5/29 11:58:19
                    RE: You believe the bill will not result in a deficit in FY26? (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 5/29 12:15:13
                    Context matters - MU Diaspora MU - 5/29 12:11:57
                         RE: Context matters - meatiger MU - 5/29 12:42:33
                              what's the "lol" for? Are you saying there will be no futur - 90Tiger STL - 5/29 12:52:41
                                   bills of consequence, no - meatiger MU - 5/29 13:39:34
                                   Not unless/until they get 60 R Senators - haeffb MU - 5/29 13:08:20
                                        that wasn't meat's intent, but thanks dad. Hey, did Congres - 90Tiger STL - 5/29 13:36:39
                                             Is it stopped? (nm) - haeffb MU - 5/29 13:46:51
          it's a mega-cult in some ways unable to question their ... - tmcats KSU - 5/29 11:14:23
               Yet you believe the CBO - MU Diaspora MU - 5/29 11:55:01
          Haha, still on that bender? Where is all your Trump is owned - Razor MU - 5/29 11:11:44
               RE: Haha, still on that bender? Where is all your Trump is owned - Columbian Gold MU - 5/29 11:15:05
     Well, there is a little hold up - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 5/29 10:57:06
          RE: Well, there is a little hold up - meatiger MU - 5/29 12:03:16
          Where is the bill? (nm) - TigerMatt STL - 5/29 11:14:24
               It is not time for that to be addressed - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 5/29 11:50:32
                    Incorrect. They are choosing reconciliation - haeffb MU - 5/29 11:59:44
                         And it is the smart political play given the makeup - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 5/29 12:16:07
                              RE: And it is the smart political play given the makeup - 90Tiger STL - 5/29 12:18:35
                                   They do need to go back to the old process of passing each - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 5/29 12:24:59
                                        yep, but it won't happen - but it's all about POTUS, that's - 90Tiger STL - 5/29 12:57:56
     Politicians being politicians - MU Diaspora MU - 5/29 10:39:59
     Because (as shown in the article) - Spanky KU - 5/29 10:37:38
          nice diversion from reality ... - tmcats KSU - 5/29 10:41:09
               rescissions cannot be enacted through a reconciliation bill. - Spanky KU - 5/29 11:00:39
               Let me guess, you believe the CBO and don’t - 90Tiger STL - 5/29 10:49:57
                    Congress doesn’t pass appropriations bills any more (nm) - haeffb MU - 5/29 10:55:09
                         wrong - Spanky KU - 5/29 12:54:06
                              Sorry, I meant the 12 individual appropriations - haeffb MU - 5/29 13:04:56
               The point is there's a process that grandstanders ignore - MU Diaspora MU - 5/29 10:43:32




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard