Welcome Guest

Actually, it isn't. A fetus is no more a human being than a

Posted on: May 1, 2025 at 10:58:32 CT

SparkyStalcup MU

Posts:

25108

Member For:

13.52 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

tumor. They both have the potential (note...potential...meaning theyare not now human) to grow into something different, but neither is a human being, although they both have human DNA.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Libs be hypocrites - Spanky KU - 4/29 18:32:49

Actually, the Clintons, Obama & Biden all wanted more - JeffB MU

- 4/29 19:24:00

Yes, those fines are stupid.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 4/29 18:53:10

I'm sure the libs on the board will avoid your post. (nm) - Outsider MU - 4/29 18:45:39

Of course not. And they already m*bed off their biggest - MIZ45 MU - 4/29 19:11:15

They always do when the truth is being told* - OntheMark MU - 4/29 18:54:44

It’s not a truth. It is a logical fallacy.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 4/29 18:56:19

It’s faulty logic. Those animals are not inside a human’s - TigerMatt STL - 4/29 18:54:41

Now THAT’S faulty logic - Spanky KU - 4/29 19:11:43

Human dummy. Your false equivalency shows you aren’t - TigerMatt STL - 4/29 19:16:13

All are on moral grounds - Spanky KU - 4/29 21:08:29

The argument for protecting eggs of endangered species - TigerMatt STL - 4/29 22:26:46

So you are arguing that the endangered species have greater - pinkman MU - 4/29 19:44:29

No. Why do you people make up your own strawmen constantly?(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 4/29 22:00:12

I thought you were big on science. A fetus IS a human being - JeffB MU

- 4/29 19:26:00

Well, a fetus does have human DNA, but so do tumors - SparkyStalcup MU - 4/29 21:10:04

Straw man argument, of course. You flail against an argument - JeffB MU

- 4/30 12:11:32

Actually, it isn't. A fetus is no more a human being than a - SparkyStalcup MU - 5/1 10:58:32

It might surprise many that there has been an unaltered - JeffB MU

- 4/29 19:32:17

Life =/= being. An amoeba is life. It is not a being.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 4/29 19:33:06

You can't make up your own definitions to back up your - JeffB MU

- 4/29 19:47:33

It’s not my own definition. You are conflating - TigerMatt STL - 4/29 19:52:11

No, you are throwing around generalities and once again - JeffB MU

- 4/29 20:00:43

When do human beings (normally) begin? - JeffB MU

- 4/29 19:29:23

Links written by stupid people who don’t know what a being - TigerMatt STL - 4/29 19:30:35

Putting your fingers in your ears and refusing to read what - JeffB MU

- 4/29 20:01:56

You aren’t listening to what they are saying.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 4/29 20:08:32

YOU are the one ignoring what they're saying as confidently - JeffB MU

- 4/30 10:30:10

You are confusing human cells with a human being. Learn - TigerMatt STL - 4/29 19:28:48

For all of your scientific posturing you are quite obtuse. - JeffB MU

- 4/29 19:35:57

You are going stupid and not stopping to think. That - TigerMatt STL - 4/29 19:46:57

You are bouncing all over the place, Matt, speaking out of - JeffB MU

- 4/29 19:53:30

Again. Life starts at conceptions. A zygote is not a human - TigerMatt STL - 4/29 19:59:39

You can make up your own narrative all you want, Matt, but - JeffB MU

- 4/29 20:41:15

Do you understand a few cells don’t make a person?(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 4/29 21:58:46

When does human life begin? – Senate Judiciary Subcommittee - JeffB MU

- 4/29 19:27:28

Again.. you are conflating different concepts stupidly(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 4/29 19:29:49

Baloney. You do not want to accept reality. Those are top - JeffB MU

- 4/29 19:40:45

You are conflating two different topics in a hysterical - TigerMatt STL - 4/29 19:48:17

No, but the mother's rights aren't being infringed when - Seagull MU - 4/29 19:13:03