 |
|
Cook was a better runner but they did run more designed
Posted on: April 29, 2025 at 08:24:03 CT
playhard KC
Posts:
95333
Member For:
14.15 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
runs for him. Overall i'd say Cook is much better with his legs. Aside from that, as a passer they're on different planets.
Comparing last year.
Cook 2525 passing yards, 62% completion 11TD's 2INT's
Sanders 4134 passing yards, 72% completion 37TD's, 10INT's
It's night and day, Cook had a much better oline around him with at least one NFL receiver in Burden if not two with Wease. Sanders did have one hell of a WR in Hunter and some other weapons.
Comparing last year.
Cook 2525 passing yards, 62% completion 11TD's 2INT's
Sanders 4134 passing yards, 72% completion 37TD's, 10INT's
It's night and day, Cook had a much better oline around him with at least one NFL receiver in Burden if not two with Wease. Sanders did have one hell of a WR in Hunter and some other weapons.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
Cook was a better runner but they did run more designed - playhard KC - 4/29 08:24:03