Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

skeptical

Posted on: March 22, 2025 at 09:00:08 CT
sks MU
Posts:
648
Member For:
9.1 months
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
I'm skeptical, because I'm not sure there really is an "official narrative". My understanding, and I'm no expert, is that the "official narrative" is that there is simply no actual proof that there were more people involved than Oswald. I don't think it was just Oswald, but at this point I am skeptical that there is actual proof of a wider conspiracy. Remember, there is a difference between what you and I decide to believe and being able to definitively prove something.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

JFK files will change the official narrative. Fox interview - JeffB MU - 3/21 20:03:12
     skeptical - sks MU - 3/22 09:00:08
          You are probably right that there won't be enough evidence - JeffB MU - 3/22 11:06:26
     Oswald was a patsy, but I doubt the files can prove it...nm - tigertix MU - 3/22 07:57:15
     they really need Oswald's & Ruby's income sources released - MU-TULSA MU - 3/21 22:21:15
     Multiple shooters. nm. - MUTGR MU - 3/21 20:24:36
          Read a few pages - it was mostly nothing burger - Mormad MU - 3/21 20:28:02
               He said that the one bullet narrative has been totally - JeffB MU - 3/21 20:48:30
                    RE: He said that the one bullet narrative has been totally - MUTGR MU - 3/21 21:34:03
                         I was just referring to the pages I read - Mormad MU - 3/21 21:49:57
                              I think there are tens of thousands of pages of newly - JeffB MU - 3/22 10:54:42
                              RE: I was just referring to the pages I read - MUTGR MU - 3/21 23:07:02
               I read a few pages of a history book - Seagull MU - 3/21 20:40:42




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard