Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Ludecke v Watkins ruling: Doesn't matter. Judicial review is

Posted on: March 19, 2025 at 15:19:48 CT
BH O'bonga MU
Posts:
25762
Member For:
5.52 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
not in the Constitution. The practice was invented by lower court judges some 40 years later. Its the President's responsibility to see that the laws are faithfully executed. The Judicial Branch lower courts have no authority to second guess his administration of the government. The Supreme Court has responsibility to rule on matters of law and the Constitution. There is no role for District Court judges.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

DOJ slams District Judge Boasberg - Spanky KU - 3/19 12:58:45
     Ultimately all of these legal cases trying to delay Trump - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/19 13:23:55
          In the cases filed against Trump's actions where a - KCT-BoneTiger MU - 3/19 13:30:48
               do you? - FootballRefugee MU - 3/19 13:51:34
               Yes, and it does not matter what side it is coming from - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/19 13:50:32
          Trump will get a mixed bag ruling from SCOTUS - Spanky KU - 3/19 13:28:04
               Why would they rule that way when there is specific language - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/19 13:52:38
                    "by a foreign nation or government." - Spanky KU - 3/19 14:11:52
                         They all come from the same nation. Wow, just wow.(nm) - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/19 14:26:22
                              When the Crips expanded their operations from California - Spanky KU - 3/19 14:36:26
                                   Dumb analogy. Even by your low standards.(nm) - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/19 14:43:14
                                        Why? US gangbangers opened shop in Canada - Spanky KU - 3/19 14:51:01
                                             So you're saying that the Venezuelan government - hangman MU - 3/19 17:26:08
               RE: Trump will get a mixed bag ruling from SCOTUS - BH O'bonga MU - 3/19 13:34:09
                    And the Court case some are citing (Ludecke v. Watkins) - Spanky KU - 3/19 13:44:30
                         There was a declared war that applied to that case. But the - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/19 13:54:56
                              and that is... - Spanky KU - 3/19 14:04:56
                                   according to the President's order - FootballRefugee MU - 3/19 14:06:48
                                        He needs to show that they are ordering this - Spanky KU - 3/19 14:09:14
                                             no he doesn't (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 3/19 15:56:51
                                             No he really doesn't. They are here in force, they are all - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/19 14:27:54
                                                  Yes he really does....and the case is not closed. - Spanky KU - 3/19 14:38:01
                                             he has proclaimed it - FootballRefugee MU - 3/19 14:19:02
                         RE: And the Court case some are citing (Ludecke v. Watkins) - BH O'bonga MU - 3/19 13:50:18
                              Read the article.. not an opinion site(nm) - Spanky KU - 3/19 13:52:03
                                   here ... not an opinion site - FootballRefugee MU - 3/19 13:59:22
                                        That does not address Ludecke v Watkins ruling - Spanky KU - 3/19 14:02:32
                                             Ludecke v Watkins ruling: Doesn't matter. Judicial review is - BH O'bonga MU - 3/19 15:19:48
                                                  Then why are supporters of Trump's use of the Act citing - Spanky KU - 3/19 15:26:53
                                                       RE: Then why are supporters of Trump's use of the Act citing - BH O'bonga MU - 3/19 15:55:10
                                                            You don’t too goodly read if you think that(nm) - Spanky KU - 3/19 16:03:47
                                             It is not JUST a wartime power. You repeating it does not - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/19 14:29:45
                                                  It is a wartime power - Spanky KU - 3/19 15:09:15
                                             it addresses the letter of the law - FootballRefugee MU - 3/19 14:05:47
                                                  and the letter of the law does not apply to foreign gang - Spanky KU - 3/19 14:08:10
                                                       depends who ordered it - FootballRefugee MU - 3/19 14:14:41
                                                            and there is zero evidence a foreign government ordered it - Spanky KU - 3/19 14:38:41
                                                                 There does not have to be. Nothing in the act says that the - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/19 14:45:03
                                                                      No.. they didn't. - Spanky KU - 3/19 14:58:33
                                                                           you're arguing in a circle (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 3/19 15:57:56
                                                                                Am I? - Spanky KU - 3/19 18:27:07
                                   read the rest of the law - FootballRefugee MU - 3/19 13:58:28
                                        You were shown to be wrong yesterday - Spanky KU - 3/19 14:03:21
                                             no, you're making the same mistake - FootballRefugee MU - 3/19 14:05:25
                                                  Wait for the ruling from SCOTUS. The law does not apply - Spanky KU - 3/19 14:07:09
                                                       of course it does - FootballRefugee MU - 3/19 14:19:57
                                                            The only use of the Act has been during 3 declared wars - Spanky KU - 3/19 14:43:59
                                                                 Please read the full act. It DOES NOT have to be a declared - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/19 14:46:24
                                                                      The gang bangers are not a 'foreign nation or government' - Spanky KU - 3/19 14:59:43
                                                                           the order opines on the connection - FootballRefugee MU - 3/19 15:02:53
                                                                                The order will fail judicial review.(nm) - Spanky KU - 3/19 15:09:50
                    It actually is what the law says - Spanky KU - 3/19 13:38:12
                         Keep reading the word OR indicates that there are other - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/19 13:56:25
                         that is *actually* part of what the law says - FootballRefugee MU - 3/19 13:56:24
                         RE: It actually is what the law says - BandG MU - 3/19 13:55:21
                         RE: It actually is what the law says - BH O'bonga MU - 3/19 13:51:21
                              It shows when the Act is applicable. And deporting gang - Spanky KU - 3/19 14:00:42
                                   You have been proven wrong multiple times in this thread - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/19 14:28:45
                              I'm sure those other words don't add any important context - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/19 13:57:58
                                   Please show how that law applies to gang bangers - Spanky KU - 3/19 14:06:23
                                        Read the act . - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/19 14:25:08
                                             No.. it does not apply(nm) - Spanky KU - 3/19 15:27:52
                                                  Tell us why it doesn't. Don't just say it doesn't. (nm) - Logan STL - 3/19 16:17:43
                                        They are classified as terrorists affiliated with another - Logan STL - 3/19 14:17:48
                                             No more that Crips members that moved to Canada(nm) - Spanky KU - 3/19 15:28:37
                                                  That doesn't support your argument. Besides - Logan STL - 3/19 16:14:34
                                        No, but Venezuela is. (nm) - Outsider MU - 3/19 14:15:12
                                             Tren de aragua is not the Venezuelan government - Spanky KU - 3/19 15:30:32
                                                  But they are labeled terrorists who send money to - Logan STL - 3/19 16:17:01




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard