Welcome Guest

RE: so no ACC champ? (nm)

Posted on: January 3, 2025 at 12:16:29 CT

meatiger MU

Posts:

132073

Member For:

26.28 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

I am fine with the 4 top champs like we have now, and then 4 at large.

If we have the top 5 champs, reduce it to 4. (sorry I cannot remember exactly.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

two of the final four would not have been in last year ... - tmcats KSU - 1/3 11:46:14

i would have preferred Oregon, UGA, Texas, PSU (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 1/3 12:09:11

I wouldn't have minded seeing tex lose to UGa a 3rd time(nm) - SwampTiger MU - 1/3 12:10:26

I have 0 desire to see teams play 3 times - Eggs MU - 1/3 12:14:44

yup, CCGs make no sense in this environment (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 1/3 12:15:56

Expand it to 16 can say same... - cybertyger MU - 1/3 11:53:50

No more than 8 - meatiger MU - 1/3 12:08:35

8 is good, no autos. Don't care who you are the conference - tigerman81 MU - 1/3 12:36:16

8 with no auto. bids. It's not hard in this day and age to - Diamond Dave MU

- 1/3 12:35:58

one or the other - XRob MU

- 1/3 12:31:12

gotta eliminate the auto-bids if that's what you want (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 1/3 12:09:24

I am still fine with that - meatiger MU - 1/3 12:11:38

so no ACC champ? (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 1/3 12:13:12

RE: so no ACC champ? (nm) - meatiger MU - 1/3 12:16:29

top five champs get in now (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 1/3 12:17:21

RE: top five champs get in now (nm) - meatiger MU - 1/3 12:19:01

go to 16, eliminate CCGs, finish early-mid Jan (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 1/3 12:22:53

Yes(nm) - Panthera MU - 1/3 12:52:22

This is closer to my suggested model(nm) - Eggs MU - 1/3 12:25:53

I do not like the idea - meatiger MU - 1/3 12:25:17

clemson, miami, usc,e? no thanks(nm) - tmcats KSU - 1/3 12:04:47

how do you do a 12 team tourney with no byes?(nm) - CulturedDan MU

- 1/3 11:53:02

move the byes to the 2nd round - tigerinhogtown STL - 1/3 12:42:16

3 teams against each other - meatiger MU - 1/3 11:58:30