Welcome Guest

with rights comes responsibility - act irresponsibly, you

Posted on: June 12, 2024 at 20:47:30 CT
tigerinhogtown STL
Posts:
64021
Member For:
24.38 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
forfeit your enjoyment of your natural rights. You still have them, you just can't enjoy them.

Per John Locke:

And thus, in the state of nature, one man comes by a power over another; but yet no absolute or arbitrary power, to use a criminal, when he has got him in his hands, according to the passionate heats, or boundless extravagancy of his own will; but only to retribute to him, so far as calm reason and conscience dictate, what is proportionate to his transgression, which is so much as may serve for reparation and restraint: for these two are the only reasons, why one man may lawfully do harm to another, which is that we call punishment. In transgressing the law of nature, the offender declares himself to live by another rule than that of reason and common equity, which is that measure God has set to the actions of men, for their mutual security; and so he becomes dangerous to mankind, the tye, which is to secure them from injury and violence, being slighted and broken by him. Which being a trespass against the whole species, and the peace and safety of it, provided for by the law of nature, every man upon this score, by the right he hath to preserve mankind in general, MAY RESTRAIN < OR WHERE NECESSARY, DESTROY things noxious to them, and so may bring such evil on any one, who hath transgressed that law, as may make him repent the doing of it, and thereby deter him, and by his example others, from doing the like mischief. And in the case, and upon this ground, EVERY MAN HATH A RIGHT TO PUNISH THE OFFENDER, AND BE EXECUTIONER OF THE LAW OF NATURE. . . .
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

with rights comes responsibility - act irresponsibly, you - tigerinhogtown STL - 6/12 20:47:30
     False (nm) - pickle MU - 6/12 21:07:37
          substantive (nm) - tman MU - 6/12 22:42:58
     who argues that infringements shouldn't have consequences? - 90Tiger STL - 6/12 20:50:34
          "rights cannout be infringed" - they can - when you act - tigerinhogtown STL - 6/12 20:58:09
               no one argues they can’t be - pickle MU - 6/12 21:31:10
               who says rights "can't be infringed (upon)"? you're - 90Tiger STL - 6/12 21:11:09
               Whose rights did Hunter infringe upon - meatiger MU - 6/12 21:10:47
                    he didn't say he infringed on anyone's rights - Fire Marshall Bill MU - 6/12 21:11:40
                         RE: he didn't say he infringed on anyone's rights - meatiger MU - 6/12 21:16:30
                              that is why there are 12 jurors involved - tigerinhogtown STL - 6/12 21:36:28
                                   You’re being stupid (nm) - pickle MU - 6/12 22:01:24
                                   It is dumb - meatiger MU - 6/12 21:38:23
                                        So we agree. Hunter was stupid to lie on the form - Spanky KU - 6/12 21:54:38
                                             No. Denying gun purchase based on that question violates - TigerMatt STL - 6/13 00:44:38
                                                  So he should’ve answered the question truthfully and then - Spanky KU - 6/13 09:43:13
                                                       No. The US government, which lies to the people, is not - TigerMatt STL - 6/13 10:21:37
                                             We do not agree at all(nm) - meatiger MU - 6/12 21:58:55
                                                  Then you are as dumb as Hunter(nm) - Spanky KU - 6/12 22:03:09
               This is an odd logical leap to rationalize being - kmawv8 KC - 6/12 21:04:45
                    he’s like SCOTUS - pickle MU - 6/12 22:05:31
                    is it a "Republican" militia? - 90Tiger STL - 6/12 21:10:14




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard