Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Nobody is going to have a serious discussion with any

Posted on: February 2, 2024 at 13:28:38 CT
Wildcat KSU
Posts:
32943
Member For:
25.70 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
idiot who believes Tom Brady's contract causes inflation in the economy. You're dumber than fvck and beligerent on top of that, which makes for comical outcomes.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Ashtray-you have an inaccurate definition of infation - JG A - 2/2 13:24:28
     JG you nailed it again, as always. my bad. (nm) - ashtray UF - 2/2 13:41:57
          Lol (nm) - MIZ45 MU - 2/2 13:46:49
          Lol ashtray patttin that mulleted head like a child(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 2/2 13:44:58
               sarcastic or no - JG A - 2/2 13:45:59
          sweet - JG A - 2/2 13:42:33
               So what you're saying is every American should cheer for the - MIZ45 MU - 2/2 13:46:35
     This is going to be classic. I hope Ashtry jumps - tman MU - 2/2 13:38:55
          Me too - JG A - 2/2 13:40:00
     Since when did Fox News anchors call NFL games? (nm) - MIZ45 MU - 2/2 13:33:04
     Nobody is going to have a serious discussion with any - Wildcat KSU - 2/2 13:28:38
     Do you really think Fox's contract with Brady - Sal CMSU - 2/2 13:27:02
          How could it not? - JG A - 2/2 13:30:21
               JG, if there were 10x the amount of dollars in supply - ummmm MU - 2/2 13:39:58
                    He won't get that inflation is caused by an artificial - tman MU - 2/2 13:42:31
                         Inflation IS an increase in the money supply. (nm) - ummmm MU - 2/2 13:51:42
                              he’s mentally ill (nm) - pickle MU - 2/2 13:59:50
                                   you two are not just ignorant - JG A - 2/2 14:01:55
                                        Inflation is the increase in the supply of money. - ummmm MU - 2/2 14:04:31
                                             LOL NO - JG A - 2/2 14:07:04
                                                  Lol, my god. - MIZ45 MU - 2/2 14:36:31
                                                  What is confusing about his post? (nm) - Sal CMSU - 2/2 14:11:41
                                                       nothing. its just wrong - JG A - 2/2 14:51:35
                                                            because you have a simpleton's understanding of - ashtray UF - 2/2 15:02:20
                                                                 Unfortunately (for me) - JG A - 2/2 15:07:42
                                                                      ok. you go with that (nm) - ashtray UF - 2/2 15:08:29
                                                                           Unlike so many of you, including you, - JG A - 2/2 15:17:51
                              LOL NO - JG A - 2/2 13:53:38
                         LOL it can be - JG A - 2/2 13:44:37
                    LOL no - JG A - 2/2 13:41:27
                         What example? (nm) - ummmm MU - 2/2 14:02:23
                              You should answer my question first - JG A - 2/2 14:06:02
                                   Answered here: - ummmm MU - 2/2 14:06:35
                                        that is an incorrect definition - JG A - 2/2 14:59:43
                                             So why aren't you providing the correct definition? (nm) - MIZ45 MU - 2/2 17:45:44
               BTW sal, this is an open google test. - JG A - 2/2 13:34:50
                    I am not the one confused here (nm) - Sal CMSU - 2/2 14:02:18
                         I'd say you are way beyond confused, way beyond mere - JG A - 2/2 14:04:05




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard