 |
|
It was a reply to yours
Posted on: December 7, 2023 at 12:40:14 CT
meatiger MU
Posts:
133310
Member For:
26.48 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Yet you keep trying to make my words something else.
The qualifier for me to be all in would be at least 2-3 years of sustained success. Pinkel got us to 4 champ games in 6 years. And he had a history of coaching before Mizzou.
I only brought up the big programs as a side qualifier of how others would view him.
To put another way I would not give him a gives extension this year. He has not earned it yet. If he has a similar year next year, I would put him in the top 1/3 of the SEC.
The qualifier for me to be all in would be at least 2-3 years of sustained success. Pinkel got us to 4 champ games in 6 years. And he had a history of coaching before Mizzou.
I only brought up the big programs as a side qualifier of how others would view him.
To put another way I would not give him a gives extension this year. He has not earned it yet. If he has a similar year next year, I would put him in the top 1/3 of the SEC.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
It was a reply to yours - meatiger MU - 12/7 12:40:14