His reasoning is quite flawed.
Posted on: November 15, 2023 at 16:01:39 CT
JeffB
MU
Posts:
72409
Member For:
21.46 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
For one, he's using human rights groups, probably ADL and other radical left wing groups that unilaterally decide that those they disagree with are the extremists.
He's also claiming that those not on board with the LGBTQ++ agenda are extremists because "the good guys" don't ban books. But these books aren't being banned... eg. prohibiting them from being printed or sold or read. Schools and libraries have always vetted their books. Do you think this guy would be in favor of the schools and libraries be stocking their shelves with books lauding the KKK or Nazis? Or giving tutorials on how to make explosives... or how to torture animals? Of course not.
He probably wouldn't want them having books claiming that anthropogenic global warming is overblown, or creationism or a multitude of others on a variety of topics.
He's also claiming that 'the good guys' wouldn't be supported by the Proud Boys or presumably any other group that he doesn't like. Does that mean that the LGBTQ+ side is not "the good guys" because they are supported by BLM, communists, leftists and Democrats, among a variety of other unsavory groups?
Edited by JeffB at 16:04:47 on 11/15/23