 |
|
Someone should do a comparison of the overwhelming proof
Posted on: September 17, 2023 at 10:45:24 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
61521
Member For:
8.49 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Democrats had before impeaching Donald Trump for his phone call. He was accused of treason for god's sake.
Adam Schiff we know had mountains, tons, piles of absolute dispositive proof of all of trump's malfeasance. But I guess he wanted to protect the country and chose not to reveal any of it.
Ever.
He by the way, will be the next senator in California.
There was just another idiot talking head on television crowing about how there is not a shred of evidence that DIRECTLY, links whispering Joe Biden to any corruption or impeachable offenses.
They are now relying heavily on the word direct. And they are totally incurious about any of the evidence pointing to Joe Biden.
Evidence is different than proof. I would suggest that the proof is there, if the reports are accurate. But the finders of proof, our juries and the Senate in an impeachment trial have concluded that Biden is innocent and guiltless of anything other than being persecuted by the evil right wing media in this country.
So since no jury or the Senate has convicted whispering Joe Biden before there's even a trial or impeachment, Democrats will tell us that there is no direct proof of any wrongdoing.
With Republicans, proof is established in the accusation. With Democrats proof after adjudication is insufficient.
Edited by hokie at 10:57:53 on 09/17/23
Adam Schiff we know had mountains, tons, piles of absolute dispositive proof of all of trump's malfeasance. But I guess he wanted to protect the country and chose not to reveal any of it.
Ever.
He by the way, will be the next senator in California.
There was just another idiot talking head on television crowing about how there is not a shred of evidence that DIRECTLY, links whispering Joe Biden to any corruption or impeachable offenses.
They are now relying heavily on the word direct. And they are totally incurious about any of the evidence pointing to Joe Biden.
Evidence is different than proof. I would suggest that the proof is there, if the reports are accurate. But the finders of proof, our juries and the Senate in an impeachment trial have concluded that Biden is innocent and guiltless of anything other than being persecuted by the evil right wing media in this country.
So since no jury or the Senate has convicted whispering Joe Biden before there's even a trial or impeachment, Democrats will tell us that there is no direct proof of any wrongdoing.
With Republicans, proof is established in the accusation. With Democrats proof after adjudication is insufficient.
Edited by hokie at 10:57:53 on 09/17/23
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Someone should do a comparison of the overwhelming proof - hokie VT - 9/17 10:45:24