Ummmm, as promised here is another chance to answer or
Posted on: September 10, 2023 at 09:13:59 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
67500
Member For:
9.53 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
avoid a question I've asked many times.
Try some more of your lazy, vague, bullshjt and tell us about natural rights, but under no circumstances, should you ever, ever, friggin ever answer the question about who decides disputed rights.
In the event that someone interprets the word of God differently than you do, who decides which rights prevail?
I think you described it earlier as, "common sense".
That's so sweet. Ever hear of sovereign citizens? Ever hear of drug addicted criminals? Do they have common sense?
Unicorns and rainbows and idiots.
Following is my complete post from below which I told you I would post if you chickened out yet again.
..
Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe
You really are stupid.
How is the right to bear arms a, "negative" right?
And I've only asked here a dozen or so times, but I'll try again and then when you don't answer, I'll start a new thread on top of the board.
Who settles disputes if two or three or 5000 people disagree on what God laid out as natural rights?
You've never addressed that and even your lazy re-posting of previous posts doesn't touch it. You have no answer, and you don't have the courage or the integrity to admit it.
Who settles disputes when natural rights are in question?