 |
|
wait.. if you're "sure there are men who wouldn't work for
Posted on: July 2, 2023 at 14:52:28 CT
zounami MU
Posts:
72138
Member For:
11.20 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
a lady" then how wasn't it a fair question? How was it "over the edge" instead of a pragmatic concern?
You then added "but it shouldn't be that way" which I agree with... but it *is*. And btw, the premise of my post was that some men (especially "macho" coaching types) would *prefer* a male boss — the same way women generally prefer (feel more comfortable) working with/for/under a woman. That's quite different than being *unwilling* to work for a person of the opposite sex.
Lastly, it's incredible how the left has intimidated/manipulated reasonable people, like yourself, into pretending real-world issues don't exist. The Chinese have a term for this Western phenomenon — "Baizuo" — which roughly translates to "white liberal clown" (ideologues without real-world concerns).
You then added "but it shouldn't be that way" which I agree with... but it *is*. And btw, the premise of my post was that some men (especially "macho" coaching types) would *prefer* a male boss — the same way women generally prefer (feel more comfortable) working with/for/under a woman. That's quite different than being *unwilling* to work for a person of the opposite sex.
Lastly, it's incredible how the left has intimidated/manipulated reasonable people, like yourself, into pretending real-world issues don't exist. The Chinese have a term for this Western phenomenon — "Baizuo" — which roughly translates to "white liberal clown" (ideologues without real-world concerns).
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
wait.. if you're "sure there are men who wouldn't work for - zounami MU - 7/2 14:52:28
-