you're either missing the point or choosing to ignore it
Posted on: June 5, 2023 at 12:06:37 CT
Fire Marshall Bill STL
Posts:
82089
Member For:
13.53 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
I'm not sure which one. This has nothing to do with the hiring of Drink.
The point I'm making is that all records aren't created equal and aren't an objective tell all to the overall impact someone has at a place. When someone says Drink is below .500, you're the first one to throw out a list of all of these challenges Drink has to deal with here as a defense to his ****ty record. Same idea here, I'm sure Jackson had a ****load of things to overcome that contributed to those records being less than spectacular.