 |
|
No. It was last relevant when MU was attempting
Posted on: May 23, 2023 at 17:38:10 CT
FIJItiger MU
Posts:
141942
Member For:
21.30 yrs
Level:
Moderator
M.O.B. Votes:
0
To scapegoat Haith to distract from how bad Kim Anderson was doing. So they turned in zero waiver requests and attributed the players that left under Kim to Haiths APR. The penalty for low APR is not being able to participate in postseason play, which didn’t matter to that staff because they were never not going to finish last in the SEC. But APR was calculated on a 4 year rolling window so when MU started trying to actually compete again it was relevant because that score was still part of the calculation and we experienced historic levels of player turnover and academic issues under Kim that potentially made that rolling window worse.
But once we started trying again we just submitted waivers for everything making our score as meaningless as everyone else’s. It’s no longer a meaningful or relevant metric.
But once we started trying again we just submitted waivers for everything making our score as meaningless as everyone else’s. It’s no longer a meaningful or relevant metric.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
No. It was last relevant when MU was attempting - FIJItiger MU - 5/23 17:38:10