Welcome Guest

Why didn't Durham subpoena/interview comey, strzok and

Posted on: May 18, 2023 at 16:32:45 CT

hokie VT

Posts:

67546

Member For:

9.53 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

the FIB Director?

Why were no indictments recommended in 307 pages of detailed listings of malfeasance, corruption and possibly treason?

That report starts to take on the look of a compromise, a deal, a political document, where some things will be acknowledged, while others must remain hidden.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Why didn't Durham subpoena/interview comey, strzok and - hokie VT - 5/18 16:32:45

Nothing there dumbsht(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 5/18 18:31:24

LOL the investigation to look at FBI wrongdoing - JG A - 5/18 16:59:34

RE: LOL the investigation to look at FBI wrongdoing - Catturd USMC - 5/18 17:14:28

He prosecuted two, and lost both. I thought Bull Durham was - Ace AU - 5/18 16:48:54

Watch some lying hypocrite whine about - JG A - 5/18 17:00:27

Who did Mueller convict for Russian collusion?(nm) - Spanky KU - 5/18 16:56:30

RE: Who did Mueller convict for Russian collusion?(nm) - sarasotatiger MU - 5/18 18:01:10

Russia colluded with Hillary campaign - Spanky KU - 5/18 18:16:34

RE: Russia colluded with Hillary campaign - sarasotatiger MU - 5/18 18:30:52

Fact: Steele Dossier was Russian disinformation - Spanky KU - 5/18 18:56:04

Mueller wasn't prosecuting. DOJ was. Manafort comes to mind - Ace AU - 5/18 17:05:07

Manafort was not prosecuted for Russia collusion - Spanky KU - 5/18 17:08:24