Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

The purpose of the law is in no way an expectation that we

Posted on: July 27, 2022 at 10:11:42 CT
4TigersinMichigan MU
Posts:
126863
Member For:
22.76 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
2
can carry it out. It is entirely meant to show us the reason we need a savior. Not that we don't strive for something better, but the reality is that if we could pull it off we wouldn't need Jesus Christ. We would just do it ourselves if we wanted to badly enough. That is not possible.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Let's make it really, really simple - Yes or No question - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 09:43:01
     no, i don't want gvmt creating and enforcing "morality" - 90Tiger STL - 7/27 14:57:21
     Yes. (nm) - JeffB MU - 7/27 12:22:16
          Not so hard - right?(nm) - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 13:28:52
               troll (nm) - pickle MU - 7/27 13:46:31
     No - meatiger MU - 7/27 10:30:55
          So it's not against the law in the park. What happens - hokie VT - 7/27 10:45:11
               learn how to ask questions (nm) - pickle MU - 7/27 10:56:58
               It is then trespassing(nm) - meatiger MU - 7/27 10:48:59
                    And who enforces trespassing laws? Nm - hokie VT - 7/27 10:51:38
                         First would be park security - meatiger MU - 7/27 10:55:22
                              And then the state....police? So If Pinkel is handing it to - hokie VT - 7/27 11:24:36
                                   Lol - meatiger MU - 7/27 11:26:39
                                        Once again, too stupid to answer, be short vague and - hokie VT - 7/27 11:28:18
                                             It was not a question - meatiger MU - 7/27 11:37:09
                                                  and he obviously has pretty vivid fantasies about pickle - ashtray UF - 7/27 13:13:13
     If she is hot then yes its fine - Chievous'Bandaid MU - 7/27 10:29:30
          sorry didn't read far enough below. - Chievous'Bandaid MU - 7/27 10:30:24
     Yes it should be illegal. - bluesox7 MU - 7/27 10:11:15
     Thanks for the responses - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:09:31
          Thanks for the laugh, - mizzoumurfkc KC - 7/27 10:14:38
               You are welcome - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:16:39
          the only one who didn’t is GAT - pickle MU - 7/27 10:12:52
          I'm not shocked by your dishonesty at all - ashtray UF - 7/27 10:11:36
               prepare for the swallows to capistrano post (nm) - pickle MU - 7/27 10:14:07
                    *salmon to capistrano(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:21:35
                         i had to look that up (nm) - pickle MU - 7/27 10:22:31
                              I'm embarrassed for you(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:29:48
                              oh come on. - kmawv8 MU - 7/27 10:24:45
                                   never saw the movie - pickle MU - 7/27 10:33:32
                                        oh dear. - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:36:23
          GAT is the only one who didn't answer yes (or its - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:11:06
               hokie equivocated, maybe that's who he's talking about?(nm) - SwampTiger MU - 7/27 10:13:50
                    oh, true (nm) - pickle MU - 7/27 10:14:32
               The string is below - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:12:08
                    Since the string is below, can you identify who did this: - ummmm MU - 7/27 10:36:06
                         It was a yes/no question - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:37:03
                              Only GAT failed to provide a clear yes or no. - ummmm MU - 7/27 10:38:51
                                   he's a troll and uses a smug schtick to cover his cowardice(nm) - SwampTiger MU - 7/27 10:41:35
                                   The thread is the thread - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:39:57
                                        troll (nm) - pickle MU - 7/27 10:41:08
                                        name names(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:40:38
                                             Why? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:42:12
                                                  How about one name? (nm) - ummmm MU - 7/27 10:43:38
                                                  because you said there was a "string" of posters who - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:43:30
                                                       Reino didn't answer "yes" or "no" either. - tigerdb MU - 7/27 11:17:34
                                                            yes he did (nm) - pickle MU - 7/27 11:26:50
                                                                 openly spanking it in the park is an infringement upon - tigerdb MU - 7/27 11:30:54
                                                                      “Oh, i was wrong. Reino did answer” (nm) - pickle MU - 7/27 11:36:43
                                                                           That's inconsistent with "no"(nm) - tigerdb MU - 7/27 11:40:04
                                                                                what part of Reino’s “no.” confused you? - pickle MU - 7/27 11:41:39
                                                                                     I'm not confused - I'll give you credit, at least you were - tigerdb MU - 7/27 11:47:10
                                                                                          no, you’re definitely confused - pickle MU - 7/27 11:57:16
                                                                                               So, not only are you dumb as shlt, but you're also dishonest - tigerdb MU - 7/27 12:22:27
                                                                                                    holy ****, you are stupid (nm) - pickle MU - 7/27 12:29:25
                                                       OK - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:45:26
                                                       He knows that wasn't accurate. - ummmm MU - 7/27 10:44:12
                                                            I just did - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:46:03
                                                                 you’re still being dishonest - pickle MU - 7/27 10:52:58
                                                                 yes, you answered after he asked the question. - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:52:45
                                                            if nothing else, he's given us a good lesson on dishonesty - ashtray UF - 7/27 10:45:53
     No (nm) - kmawv8 MU - 7/27 10:02:00
     No. Unless the action infringes on another individual (s). - hefeweizen MU - 7/27 09:59:59
          What do you consider to be "infringement"? - tigerdb MU - 7/27 10:15:07
               keep me out of your fantasies, please (nm) - pickle MU - 7/27 11:27:49
                    Your fantasies = pickletopia - tigerdb MU - 7/27 13:05:41
                         i don’t know what “pickletopia” is - pickle MU - 7/27 13:55:30
                              Liar(nm) - tigerdb MU - 7/27 14:24:56
                                   i don’t lie - pickle MU - 7/27 16:02:39
     Yes(nm) - tigerdb MU - 7/27 09:59:49
     Few issues can be answered just yes or no. - GA Tiger MU - 7/27 09:59:40
          Doing it at 3 am, when no one is around = "getting away - tigerdb MU - 7/27 10:06:34
          Why can few questions be answered with yes or no? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:01:58
               pickletonians always have a modifier. - Tigrrrr! MU - 7/27 10:09:54
                    GAT is a pickletopian? (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 7/27 10:20:10
                         The further one goes right the less - GA Tiger MU - 7/27 11:53:36
                              If you think it doesn't hurt anyone even if little kids are - JeffB MU - 7/27 12:24:35
          apparently 4Tigs needs a law to tell him it's not ok - ashtray UF - 7/27 10:01:44
               False premise. - JeffB MU - 7/27 12:26:58
                    no (nm) - ashtray UF - 7/27 13:11:56
               He does. It's the crutch of Covenentalists (of which - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:09:31
                    The purpose of the law is in no way an expectation that we - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:11:42
                         Yes, that answers justification, however what keeps a - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:17:55
                              A desire to follow God's laws through the power of - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:23:47
                                   what are "God's laws"? - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:32:17
                                        It is always the goal - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:34:39
                                             you didn't answer the question(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:36:55
                                                  Mostly the 10 Commandments - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:38:33
                                                       1. Who decided it was just the 10 commandments? (although - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:41:47
                                                            Christ fulfilled the law - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:45:01
                                                                 I appreciate you answering. Can you explain how the - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:51:19
                                                                      The ceremonial law was intended to set the children of - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:56:02
                                                                           "However, the moral law remains constant" - dangertim MU - 7/27 11:02:27
                    so basically all Lutherans are immoral and need laws to - ashtray UF - 7/27 10:10:52
                    you made up those words(nm) - cnk ATL - 7/27 10:10:32
                         all words are made up, cnk (nm) - pickle MU - 7/27 10:11:40
                              you're made up!(nm) - cnk ATL - 7/27 10:11:50
                                   mean(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:20:25
                                        walk it off(nm) - cnk ATL - 7/27 10:21:09
                                             wank it off - pickle MU - 7/27 10:21:39
                                                  thank you(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:22:29
     of course it should be(nm) - Spanky KU - 7/27 09:58:53
     are they hot?(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/27 09:57:11
          OK - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 09:57:49
     what makes jerking off in a park more immoral than - ashtray UF - 7/27 09:54:11
          the punishment for cheating on your wife would be MUCH more - tigerinhogtown STL - 7/27 09:59:04
               so it should be against the law, right? (nm) - ashtray UF - 7/27 10:00:11
                    only if it happened in a public park(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 7/27 10:05:54
                         is it less damaging to do it in private? - ashtray UF - 7/27 10:09:50
     yes, but more like regulation than illegal - SwampTiger MU - 7/27 09:53:05
          ^^^^ This.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 7/27 10:00:33
          Trespassing is against the law - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 09:56:49
               getting at enforcement and punishment - SwampTiger MU - 7/27 10:01:07
                    Punishment wasn't the issue - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:02:40
                         Lol - meatiger MU - 7/27 10:28:11
                              meated it - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:31:09
                         what's the difference between having a law that explicitly - cnk ATL - 7/27 10:09:47
                              There is no difference - that is my point - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 10:13:24
                                   I gotcha(nm) - cnk ATL - 7/27 10:14:48
                         no shlt? (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 7/27 10:04:10
          how can you argue trespassing?(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/27 09:55:55
               not permitted on the property if you violate the rule (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 7/27 09:57:32
                    "shirt, shoes, and penis in pants required"(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:01:32
                         I pictured a big sign of "Park Rules" - cnk ATL - 7/27 10:04:38
                              Just look for the signage - Tigrrrr! MU - 7/27 10:19:49
                         let's see a mock up of the sign (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 7/27 10:03:26
                              BOAISY(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/27 10:06:21
                    ok. I'll allow it.(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/27 09:59:34
     no(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/27 09:52:07
     Yes of course. Unless it's a black, Hispanic, gay, female, - hokie VT - 7/27 09:52:03
          Thanks Rush (nm) - mizzoumurfkc KC - 7/27 10:13:09
          you have weird beliefs(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/27 09:52:54
               most Marxists do (nm) - ashtray UF - 7/27 09:53:15
     No. (nm) - ummmm MU - 7/27 09:49:49
     yes - tigerinhogtown STL - 7/27 09:48:45
     Is a sammich involved? - JayHoaxH8r MU - 7/27 09:48:42
     Yes (nm) - Tigrrrr! MU - 7/27 09:48:08
     no. let’s make it simple: whose rights are infringed upon - pickle MU - 7/27 09:47:57
     YES. - RHAYWORTH MU - 7/27 09:45:12
          Not surprising who is struggling with yes/no on this - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 09:57:31
               no one is struggling (nm) - pickle MU - 7/27 10:03:18
               maybe it's the false premise? - ashtray UF - 7/27 09:59:45
                    yep (nm) - pickle MU - 7/27 10:03:35
          We shall certainly see - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/27 09:48:29




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard