 |
|
The difference is: Pinkel's & Ferentz's rosters had DEPTH...
Posted on: January 9, 2022 at 16:39:24 CT
zounami MU
Posts:
72138
Member For:
11.19 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
whereas Odom's roster (by his final season) did not.
Drink inherited a couple good players, but there are *85 scholarship players* on a team. The depth was (and still is) razor thin... in fact it's the worst in the entire SEC, except for maybe Vanderbilt.
That will start to change in the next couple seasons when Drink's players are ready to contribute – assuming "NIL" doesn't make it impossible to retain them.
Edited by zounami at 16:43:32 on 01/09/22
Drink inherited a couple good players, but there are *85 scholarship players* on a team. The depth was (and still is) razor thin... in fact it's the worst in the entire SEC, except for maybe Vanderbilt.
That will start to change in the next couple seasons when Drink's players are ready to contribute – assuming "NIL" doesn't make it impossible to retain them.
Edited by zounami at 16:43:32 on 01/09/22
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
The difference is: Pinkel's & Ferentz's rosters had DEPTH... - zounami MU - 1/9 16:39:24