Welcome Guest

Since the prosecution didn't share the drone

Posted on: November 17, 2021 at 12:45:55 CT

Sal CMSU

Posts:

229171

Member For:

21.85 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

footage with the defense, how would that not be considered withholding evidence? A mistrial with prejudice should be granted due multiple actions from the prosecution, but I don't know if the judge wants that to be the deciding factor.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Since the prosecution didn't share the drone - Sal CMSU - 11/17 12:45:55

hearing coming with attorneys under oath (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 11/17 13:17:39

prosecution did release low quality drone footage. - RHAYWORTH MU - 11/17 13:02:20

what does the drone footage show?(nm) - gmmm98 MU

- 11/17 13:00:59

It's a similar video but essentially in HD - Sal CMSU - 11/17 13:22:51

Rittenhouse being chased by Rosenbaum. (nm) - Tigrrrr! MU

- 11/17 13:09:04

yikes. any justification offered by the prosecutor?(nm) - gmmm98 MU

- 11/17 13:17:03

And then there is this.... - Tigrrrr! MU

- 11/17 13:22:44

No. (nm) - Tigrrrr! MU

- 11/17 13:19:18

I heard (on here, so take it FWIW) that his lawyer filed for - dangertim MU

- 11/17 12:48:09

It was filed, but I'm not sure when the judge - Sal CMSU - 11/17 12:50:06

If they come back with aquittal it's a moot point. - dangertim MU

- 11/17 12:53:23

If there's an acquittal, how long until we hear people - Tigrrrr! MU

- 11/17 12:56:52

I'm wondering if the judge is waiting to see if - Sal CMSU - 11/17 12:54:41

I read that the judge will wait to see if acquittal, than if - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 11/17 12:54:33

makes sense to me. It's the pussy way out which is exactly - dangertim MU

- 11/17 12:55:54

he’s also giving time to allow the other side to respond (nm) - pickle MU

- 11/17 12:57:25

makes sense(nm) - dangertim MU

- 11/17 12:58:21