Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

RE: especially a link that you admit doesn't support your

Posted on: June 26, 2021 at 16:07:06 CT
Kim DUKE
Posts:
7870
Member For:
19.47 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
The link was somewhat supportive of my opinion.

Here is more support from the same inspection.

"The failed waterproofing is causing major structural damage to the concrete structural slab below these areas," he wrote. "Failure to replace the waterproofing in the near future will cause the extent of the concrete deterioration to expand exponentially."
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Engineer raised concerns about structural damage at Surfside - Kim DUKE - 6/26 14:32:54
     "didn't give any indication that the structure was at risk - Spanky KU - 6/26 14:40:04
          We must never regulate anything ever. Tear up bld codes - raskolnikov MU - 6/26 14:46:15
               Should huricane building standards apply in MN?(nm) - tman MU - 6/26 15:04:57
                    No I don't imagine that would be necessary(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 6/26 15:17:07
                         Well it is in place on many areas of construction(nm) - tman MU - 6/26 15:20:21
                              So? Sounds kinda stupid to me, sorry if that is your thing(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 6/26 15:38:49
                                   But you support gov regulation of evsrything(nm) - tman MU - 6/26 18:38:54
                                        No. I don't - raskolnikov MU - 6/26 18:49:30
                         Is there a trade off or something? (nm) - ummmm MU - 6/26 15:19:23
               psst - there were / are codes in place here, didn't - 90Tiger STL - 6/26 14:52:35
                    Were they A) strong enough and B) enforced?(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 6/26 15:17:47
                         you tell me. Did all the other buildings in the same area - 90Tiger STL - 6/26 15:27:08
                              RE: you tell me. Did all the other buildings in the same area - Kim DUKE - 6/26 15:43:39
                                   I don't know, it's your theory, Kim. why would that - 90Tiger STL - 6/26 15:58:50
                    My favorite argument. Just like using examples of - TigerMatt STL - 6/26 14:58:04
                         That analogy is a big stretch(nm) - tman MU - 6/26 15:06:02
                              not at all, people link and refer to violent crime - 90Tiger STL - 6/26 15:08:19
                                   People that commit property crime don't do so because of - tman MU - 6/26 15:12:52
                                        nobody has ever, in the history of this board, argued - 90Tiger STL - 6/26 15:13:48
                                             Where did I say they did. But the no government ever - tman MU - 6/26 15:19:34
                                                  RE: Where did I say they did. But the no government ever - 90Tiger STL - 6/26 15:29:08
                                                       Read again. I said they don't commit them because of - tman MU - 6/26 17:57:53
                                                            RE: Read again. I said they don't commit them because of - 90Tiger STL - 6/26 19:20:40
                                                                 You cant read and comprehend. Just admit you misread it - tman MU - 6/26 21:29:18
               straw - 90Tiger STL - 6/26 14:52:16
          WRONG - TigerMatt STL - 6/26 14:45:07
     read more thoroughly, kim, and don't fall for headlines - 90Tiger STL - 6/26 14:37:50
          You “teach” in a condescendingly soft tone - Ace AU - 6/26 14:58:40
               GFY doc (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 6/26 15:05:52
                    Does anybody take you seriously? - Ace AU - 6/26 15:28:59
                         More people than take you seriously. Nm - BandG MU - 6/26 16:59:45
          RE: read more thoroughly, kim, and don't fall for headlines - Kim DUKE - 6/26 14:48:19
               So the article has nothing to do with your pre-formed - 90Tiger STL - 6/26 14:57:49
                    My opinions are so easy to predict, but I am always happy to - Kim DUKE - 6/26 15:23:46
                         especially a link that you admit doesn't support your - 90Tiger STL - 6/26 15:59:57
                              RE: especially a link that you admit doesn't support your - Kim DUKE - 6/26 16:07:06
                                   it's a hype piece, Kim, sells after a disaster (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 6/26 17:19:02
                                        RE: it's a hype piece, Kim, sells after a disaster (nm) - Kim DUKE - 6/26 17:30:10
                                             lol, of course there will be lawsuits and of course lawyers - 90Tiger STL - 6/26 19:21:44
                    RE: So the article has nothing to do with your pre-formed - Kim DUKE - 6/26 15:16:57




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard