 |
|
The only chance we have is (1) the NCAA stands its ground or
Posted on: June 8, 2021 at 15:18:10 CT
zounami MU
Posts:
72138
Member For:
11.20 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
imposes some of the limitations I proposed yesterday (as a compromise with the state legislatures). My preference is that the NCAA stands its ground, refuses to ratify the proposed NIL rules, and enforces the rules against any player/school that engages in NIL. That would mean a lot of schools becoming ineligible to compete, and those schools' states (their legislatures) could be forced to compromise. That's an extremely unlikely scenario, however.
(2) Mizzou's boosters become proactive, *organize*, and find as many wealthy donors as possible to contribute toward NIL. Perhaps some big-money donors could divert their money from the AD toward NIL, since that will be more important IMO. Otherwise, we won't be able to *recruit* or *retain* talented players.
(2) Mizzou's boosters become proactive, *organize*, and find as many wealthy donors as possible to contribute toward NIL. Perhaps some big-money donors could divert their money from the AD toward NIL, since that will be more important IMO. Otherwise, we won't be able to *recruit* or *retain* talented players.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
The only chance we have is (1) the NCAA stands its ground or - zounami MU - 6/8 15:18:10