Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

that is responsive

Posted on: May 17, 2021 at 18:41:20 CT
gmmm98 MU
Posts:
13786
Member For:
15.22 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
the previous decades of decisions denying retroactive application of unconstitutional process IS IN FACT EQUALLY STUPID. it's a test that is designed to benefit the state. and has been 100% successful as your decades of precedent shows.

and how you original intent a**holes can deny retroactive application of process is unfathomable to me.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Supreme Court says unanimous jury verdict requirement does - Kim DUKE - 5/17 15:18:22
     what a stupid ruling - gmmm98 MU - 5/17 17:12:06
          What SCOTUS rulings have been retroactive? - Spanky KU - 5/17 17:30:17
               was that intended to be responsive? - gmmm98 MU - 5/17 17:37:25
                    It is responsive - Spanky KU - 5/17 17:40:35
                         it is not responsive - gmmm98 MU - 5/17 17:50:15
                              It is responsive - Spanky KU - 5/17 18:00:25
                                   you reinforced the conservative principles - gmmm98 MU - 5/17 18:13:10
                                        Try answering a question: Why is the decision stupid? - Spanky KU - 5/17 18:27:50
                                             that is responsive - gmmm98 MU - 5/17 18:41:20
                                                  As were the previous posts you deemed non-responsive(nm) - Spanky KU - 5/17 18:43:59
     Because: - Spanky KU - 5/17 15:59:25
     So they have to look at each case individually?(nm) - meatiger MU - 5/17 15:22:29




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard