Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Then it was pointless for the House to impeach

Posted on: February 13, 2021 at 17:02:41 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
146244
Member For:
20.98 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
2
Especially since they called no witnesses and did no investigation before impeaching Trump
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Best part of today was calling the dems bluff on - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/13 16:51:54
     No witnesses, no documentary evidence, no physical evidence. - BH O'bonga MU - 2/13 17:42:51
          How much do you think Nancy paid out to some editors - Tigrrrr! MU - 2/13 17:45:36
     R v D. go team (nm) - pickle MU - 2/13 17:19:45
          Okay sovereign citizen(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 2/13 19:25:50
     It was hilarious seeing how fast they folded(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 2/13 16:59:15
     It was pointless to bring in witnesses since it was obvious - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/13 16:53:51
          Then why have the trial in the first place? Retarded(nm) - tigerNkc MU - 2/13 18:14:22
          HE'S GUILTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 2/13 17:27:08
          Oof. You’re not handling this theater well. (nm) - MIZ45 MU - 2/13 17:21:03
          But he didn't murder a 10 yr old - Sal MU - 2/13 17:03:48
               RE: But he didn't murder a 10 yr old - MOCO SON MU - 2/13 17:32:59
               Wouldn't matter. In Trump's own words, he could - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/13 17:12:40
                    and did he? and, so? and have Dem leaders promised - 90Tiger STL - 2/13 17:15:53
                    He didn't shoot anybody though (nm) - Sal MU - 2/13 17:13:19
                         No one said he did. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/13 17:15:35
                              why do you keep bringing it up? (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 2/13 17:16:38
                                   Why did the defense team keep bringing up irrelevant - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/13 17:19:44
                                        What irrelevant crap? (nm) - Sal MU - 2/13 18:03:51
                                             anything they brought up, derp (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 2/13 18:05:57
                                                  Seems to be that way - Sal MU - 2/13 18:27:32
                                        another red herring. Is "failure to remove" in the Constitu - 90Tiger STL - 2/13 17:21:14
               this post of his tells you a lot, doesn't it? (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 2/13 17:10:30
                    "He must've done SOMETHING!!!!" - Tigrrrr! MU - 2/13 17:12:09
          Then it was pointless for the House to impeach - Spanky KU - 2/13 17:02:41
          Then why bring the trial if the outcome was known? (nm) - Lerxst MU - 2/13 17:02:08
          Acquit???????? (nm) - ummmm MU - 2/13 16:57:44
               I noticed that too (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 2/13 16:58:29
                    Yes, they think they would be acquitting. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/13 16:59:44
                         hey, is "Failure to Remove" in the constitution? (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 2/13 17:09:58
                              Remove is. Acquit isn't nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/13 17:11:08
                                   You realize remove isn’t the only option? - pickle MU - 2/13 18:44:07
                                   Is "failure to remove"? and btw, do you think there is - 90Tiger STL - 2/13 17:15:12
                                   How do you get to remove(nm) - tman MU - 2/13 17:12:41
                         your words bro (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 2/13 17:01:17
               By their terminology. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/13 16:58:22
                    What is your terminology?(nm) - tman MU - 2/13 16:59:05
                         Asked and already answered. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/13 17:00:24
                              Humor me?(nm) - tman MU - 2/13 17:05:37
                              nope, asked and averted (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 2/13 17:01:30
                                   See elsewhere on this board, or seek help in learning - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/13 17:04:47
                                        i read the board (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 2/13 17:06:42
                                             Called it no removal(nm) - tman MU - 2/13 17:07:59
                                                  is that in the constitution, those specific words? (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 2/13 17:09:09
                                                       Nope. He can't deal with the outcome (nm) - tman MU - 2/13 17:10:43
          you misspelled "Democrats" and "convict", partisan hack (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 2/13 16:57:36
          RE: It was pointless to bring in witnesses since it was obvious - scan MU - 2/13 16:56:10
               Maybe his financial holdings should be reviewed, now that - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/13 17:02:14
                    he was pushing it because he has a financial stake - FACT!! - 90Tiger STL - 2/13 17:07:28
                         RE: he was pushing it because he has a financial stake - FACT!! - scan MU - 2/13 17:08:41
                    ahhh going back down that road I see (nm) - Sal MU - 2/13 17:04:59
                    RE: Maybe his financial holdings should be reviewed, now that - scan MU - 2/13 17:03:57
               all-time stupid, that was. HE HAS A FINANCIAL INTEREST - 90Tiger STL - 2/13 16:58:15
                    RE: all-time stupid, that was. HE HAS A FINANCIAL INTEREST - scan MU - 2/13 16:59:52
                         sparky is essentially FIJI level mundane, his next original - 90Tiger STL - 2/13 17:01:02
          Which is why clamoring for witnesses was so foolish - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 2/13 16:54:48




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard