Welcome Guest

Did you even contemplate that the left SC will

Posted on: December 16, 2020 at 19:29:50 CT

GA Tiger MU

Posts:

252574

Member For:

26.44 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

usually rule exactly the opposite of the conservative judges, yet they follow and quote precisely the same law and precedent.

What does that mean to you? How is it relevant to court findings for election fraud.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Wait. Don't these people know that JG said that - GA Tiger MU - 12/16 18:43:47

testimony isn’t evidence - pickle MU

- 12/16 19:08:29

Really? Then why do trials allow WITNESSES? - GA Tiger MU - 12/16 19:30:59

They don't allow those witnesses to present HEARSAY(nm) - tigerdb MU - 12/16 20:26:03

GAT, you’re an idiot (nm) - pickle MU

- 12/16 19:49:21

That's not evidence... el oh el.(nm) - markymarksthirdnipple STL - 12/16 19:02:58

testimony regardimg opinions is not evidence. - tigerdb MU - 12/16 18:55:14

Ok. I never said it changed the election. I - GA Tiger MU - 12/16 19:00:48

You said "what more proof does anyone need" - tigerdb MU - 12/16 19:05:38

Did you even contemplate that the left SC will - GA Tiger MU - 12/16 19:29:50

There is a left SC? - tigerdb MU - 12/16 20:28:09

Headline should of Read - Gambler USA - 12/16 18:45:49

Jesus GAT, the exact shamed shiite laughed out of - JG MU

- 12/16 18:45:41