Welcome Guest

Sign In | Register

Didn’t say physical evidence. Are sworn statements

Posted on: November 11, 2020 at 07:58:16 CT

hokie VT

Posts:

68144

Member For:

9.66 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

0

admissible in court?

I assume you’re a lawyer....

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

I thought you lefties crowed that the USPS worker recanted. - BH O'bonga MU - 11/11 07:02:54

There are already 500+ sworn affidavits of misconduct... - zounami MU - 11/11 07:12:11

Radio news y’day began at the top of an hour saying that - hokie VT - 11/11 07:44:34

Sworn Statements aren't physical evidence - Say_What MU - 11/11 07:54:54

how much "physical evidence" was there to impeach Trump?(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 11/11 08:31:00

My God you are dumb - BigDave MU - 11/11 08:18:30

No, "hearsay" is a second-hand statement which is often - zounami MU - 11/11 08:00:30

Didn’t say physical evidence. Are sworn statements - hokie VT - 11/11 07:58:16

Sure they are... ask the scientific community how they feel - Say_What MU - 11/11 08:02:23

look at how predictable this 🤡 is... - zounami MU - 11/11 08:08:11

Da_🤡 (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 11/11 08:11:02

lol (nm) - zounami MU - 11/11 08:29:34

Link to a study about eyewitness testimony that supports - zounami MU - 11/11 08:06:05

lol, what a pivot from Russia - mizzouSECedes STL - 11/11 08:05:55

And it doesn't take *widespread* fraud to swing the election - zounami MU - 11/11 07:49:38

"They", that deferred the mail-in vote count, were - tigerdb MU - 11/11 08:09:05

wrong (nm) - zounami MU - 11/11 08:51:42

©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy About Tigerboard