Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

it isn’t

Posted on: October 1, 2020 at 15:15:45 CT
pickle MU
Posts:
267340
Member For:
26.32 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
but it can be constituted as an initiation of force depending on the situation

slander and libel are not infringements because one does not own a reputation. a reputation is created and held as a belief by others. to claim libel and slander as infringements is to claim ownership over someone else’s mind and speech

Edited by pickle at 15:17:11 on 10/01/20
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Stupid Beaker question for the Natural Rights crowd. - Spanky KU - 10/1 15:07:43
     didn't you say or imply they pointed a gun and said that? (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 15:35:50
          Nope.. merely that they had a gun. - Spanky KU - 10/1 15:41:40
               RE: Nope.. merely that they had a gun. - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 16:13:24
                    Nice try(nm) - Spanky KU - 10/1 16:20:13
                         why did you mention a gun in your scenario if you wanted - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 16:39:26
                              So not all speech is free speech? Got it!(nm) - Spanky KU - 10/1 16:53:24
                                   oh, poor spanky (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 17:33:13
                                   incorrect (nm) - pickle MU - 10/1 17:08:23
                                        Let's try it again - Spanky KU - 10/1 17:13:26
     it isn’t - pickle MU - 10/1 15:15:45
     who said that?(nm) - meatiger MU - 10/1 15:14:37
          90Tigs - Spanky KU - 10/1 15:20:54
               So you are talking about pointing a gun at someone and - meatiger MU - 10/1 15:32:07
                    I did not say the gun was pointed at anyone.. merely that I - Spanky KU - 10/1 15:38:34
                         Where is said gun? - meatiger MU - 10/1 15:41:47
                              i clearly stated it was a direct threat in the explanation (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 15:44:17
                                   I know what you said - meatiger MU - 10/1 15:46:17
                                        What is unclear?(nm) - Spanky KU - 10/1 15:54:18
                                             why mention a gun? (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 16:12:29
                                                  Why not mention that I have a gun? - Spanky KU - 10/1 16:14:34
                                                       go to bed, JG (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 16:44:27
                                                            Unable to address the scenario without saying the scenario - Spanky KU - 10/1 17:10:38
                                                                 you shared a scenario and then essentially removed - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 17:33:51
                                                                      When did I remove the gun from it?(nm) - Spanky KU - 10/1 17:43:04
                                                                           by first saying "I have a gun", which in this scenario can O - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 17:46:38
                                                                                I didn't say that I said 'I have a gun' - Spanky KU - 10/1 17:51:20
                                                                                     if you want to know if words are free speech, why did you - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 18:06:06
                                                                                          Asked and answered, counselor(nm) - Spanky KU - 10/1 18:07:03
                                                                                               asked and avoided. "why not" is not an answer, JG (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 18:25:53
                                                                                                    Read, pickle - Spanky KU - 10/1 18:34:51
                                             You have not said where the gun is and the positions - meatiger MU - 10/1 16:03:36
                                   So not free speech?(nm) - Spanky KU - 10/1 15:45:31
                              Not in my hand nor pointed at you... - Spanky KU - 10/1 15:44:03
                                   WTF does that mean - meatiger MU - 10/1 15:47:00
                                        not in my hand and not pointed at you... but on my - Spanky KU - 10/1 15:49:47
                                             so like a holster? - meatiger MU - 10/1 16:02:55
                                                  a holster.. a sling... not in my hand but on my person(nm) - Spanky KU - 10/1 16:12:42
                                                       so a clear implied direct threat, the words represent - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 16:14:30
                                                            I never said nor implied it was an invisible gun. - Spanky KU - 10/1 16:17:35
                    figures he didn’t read the post - pickle MU - 10/1 15:34:04
                         You are the one who failed to read. - Spanky KU - 10/1 15:41:13
                              why mention the gun at all if you were truly interested - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 16:12:06
                                   It shows that the speech is 100% threatening - Spanky KU - 10/1 16:23:54
                                        no, the speech without the threat of a gun is free - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 17:37:45
                                             So pickle must always assume there is no gun present unless - Spanky KU - 10/1 17:46:19
                                                  leave me out of it (nm) - pickle MU - 10/1 17:57:15
                                                  protect himself from what? what? you're circling - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 17:48:38
                                                       the threat of violence(nm) - Spanky KU - 10/1 17:58:26
                                                            what threat? (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 18:04:39
                                                                 A spoken threat that he will be shot - Spanky KU - 10/1 18:06:10
                              i didn’t read your post nor intend to - pickle MU - 10/1 15:43:22
                                   yet you responded to the post... TWICE!!! - Spanky KU - 10/1 15:45:01
                                        incorrect - pickle MU - 10/1 15:46:57
                                             then you would be....wait for it.... - Spanky KU - 10/1 15:53:53
                                                  no, spanky, he's not the dummy in this thread. You're - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 16:13:05
                                                       Neither are mutually exclusive. Do you think it is smart - Spanky KU - 10/1 16:18:55
                                                            once. you count as well as you read and think - pickle MU - 10/1 17:06:58
                                                                 You responded twice - Spanky KU - 10/1 17:19:44
                                                                      i replied to two different posts once each - pickle MU - 10/1 17:56:14
                                                                           On the same scenario without reading either - Spanky KU - 10/1 17:57:55
                                                            is this you thinking you've conquered understanding rights? - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 16:40:20
                                                                 Nope.. It is me showing that not all speech is free speech(nm) - Spanky KU - 10/1 16:56:10
                                                                      no, you removed the gun from your scenario, spanky (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 10/1 17:34:30
                                                                      no (nm) - pickle MU - 10/1 17:07:33




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard