Welcome Guest

You misunderstand. We dont know what the Vance

Posted on: July 9, 2020 at 10:09:20 CT
SparkyStalcup MU
Posts:
25308
Member For:
13.64 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
NY case involves exactly, but the prosecutor had reason to issue a subpoena for the information from Trump. The case centered on whether the president had broad immunity and could legally avoid the subpoena. SCOTUS just said no to Trump on that count.

Trump still has the opportunity to quash the subpoena on normal legal grounds like any other citizen. That's why the case was remanded.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

lol SCOTUS blocks congress from Drumpf's records - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/9 09:32:34
          Yep on both(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/9 09:47:00
     But not the NY AG(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 7/9 09:36:38
          I think they remanded that one - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/9 09:37:54
               RE: I think they remanded that one - MrBlueSky MU - 7/9 09:41:01
                    Won't happen before the election - BigDave MU - 7/9 09:44:22
                         The NY grand jury could return an indictment of Trump - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/9 09:58:24
                              Without the tax returns - BigDave MU - 7/9 10:02:57
                                   Sparky is one of our "slower" posters(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/9 10:04:21
                              Jesus Christ - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/9 10:01:21
                                   You misunderstand. We dont know what the Vance - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/9 10:09:20
                                        You honestly have absolutely no idea what you are talking - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/9 10:13:47
                              Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/9 10:00:49
                    They were both remanded. - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/9 09:44:11
                    Grand jury proceedings are secret. Those tax returns - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/9 09:43:48
                         Ain't no secrets when dems involved - RHAYWORTH MU - 7/9 10:17:12
                         lol - dangertim MU - 7/9 09:50:17
                              So you went back 15 years to find a few examples - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/9 10:01:36
                                   I found one u couldn't dispute. - RHAYWORTH MU - 7/9 10:19:04
                                   you are willfully naive. - dangertim MU - 7/9 10:06:20
                                        No, but apparently you dont know what almost means. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/9 10:10:17
                              Sparky has to be a BlueSky double(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/9 09:55:27
                                   Even Ayn Rand would disown you nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/9 10:10:54




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard