Welcome Guest

RE: 'for obvious reasons'?

Posted on: May 12, 2020 at 22:19:49 CT
MizzouTigerz MU
Posts:
37095
Member For:
21.87 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Ed Henry on Tucker claiming to have an intel source saying

Brennan buried intel that Putin wanted Trump to win, not HRC,

to keep it out of the January 2017 ICA report

for obvious reasons

and

that part of what Grenell has declassed includes this info.



Well, there are a couple of foundational lies for the whole Trump Russia hoax that included Russia wanted Trump to win and

(While possibly true, that doesn't provide a reason for Brennan excluding it. That would be a reason to include it.)

Russia hacked the DNC/Hillary servers to help that effort.

(Since there isn't any proof that happened, it wouldn't be necessary to mention it. The only way the intel community would know is if the DNC turned over the server, and it's suspicious that they didn't.)

These are foundational lies upon which all that followed were built on.

Only the FBI never had custody of those servers and relied on Crowdstrike, the DNC/HRC IT contractor, and we just learned by testimony finally declassed by Grenell that Crowdstrike never had evidence Russia hacked those servers.

Edited by MizzouTigerz at 22:20:48 on 05/12/20
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     Only an idiot would believe the premise that commies would - TigerFan92 MU - 5/12 21:24:27
     RE: Ed Henry on Tucker claiming to have an intel source saying - BH O'bonga MU - 5/12 20:31:22
          I read it previously. Henry is about to be on Hannity - MUTGR MU - 5/12 20:36:19
     Does Russia only have 1 citizen? (nm) - North co-co champs MU - 5/12 19:54:19
          1 citizen that matters - Da_Haze KC - 5/12 20:47:55
     'for obvious reasons'? - MizzouTigerz MU - 5/12 19:48:22
          RE: 'for obvious reasons'? - MUTGR MU - 5/12 19:51:31
               RE: 'for obvious reasons'? - MizzouTigerz MU - 5/12 22:19:49
               RE: 'for obvious reasons'? - scan MU - 5/12 19:59:30
                    RE: 'for obvious reasons'? - MUTGR MU - 5/12 20:01:09




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard