Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

It's the same scenario

Posted on: May 7, 2020 at 09:28:45 CT
cnk MU
Posts:
190625
Member For:
26.49 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Person A has something that Person B values, so they give money to Person A for that thing of value.

You want the government to take the money away from Person A in one scenario because you disagree with what it is they are selling because the government told you they were bad.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Hidden in there....landlords could have their property - Tigrrrr! MU - 5/7 07:45:47
     if i read it correctly - fatrat MU - 5/7 08:18:43
          RE: if i read it correctly - meatiger MU - 5/7 08:55:26
     Scumbags(nm) - TigerFan92 MU - 5/7 08:13:31
          This will fit right in with their guaranteed monthly income - Tigrrrr! MU - 5/7 08:18:23
     You're a big fan of property seizure, as I recall. - Newcatbirdseat MU - 5/7 07:51:08
          Sure. - Tigrrrr! MU - 5/7 07:54:16
               You support civil asset forfeiture. - ummmm MU - 5/7 08:25:54
                    So if someone is raking in big bucks selling drugs - Tigrrrr! MU - 5/7 08:36:58
                         Except that has been abused, as you surely know, and - GA Tiger MU - 5/7 08:50:51
                         But if the law changes, then landlords will also be deemed - ummmm MU - 5/7 08:45:03
                              You are being a fool. - Tigrrrr! MU - 5/7 09:16:06
                                   If the law changes, it will be the same as illegal drug - ummmm MU - 5/7 09:17:48
                                        RE: If the law changes, it will be the same as illegal drug - Tigrrrr! MU - 5/7 09:38:42
                         they sold their property to another party - cnk ATL - 5/7 08:43:15
                              Sure, compare illegal drug sales to this. - Tigrrrr! MU - 5/7 09:14:52
                                   It's the same scenario - cnk ATL - 5/7 09:28:45
                                        One oar in the water makes you go in circles. - Tigrrrr! MU - 5/7 09:39:17
                                             you have no argument other than "it's illegal" - cnk ATL - 5/7 09:52:40
                         no they shouldn't. Should the makers of percocet - MrBlueSky MU - 5/7 08:41:23
                              You are being your typical idiot self. - Tigrrrr! MU - 5/7 09:13:36
                                   there's no difference. One is "legal" - MrBlueSky MU - 5/7 09:17:00
                                        RE: there's no difference. One is "legal" - Tigrrrr! MU - 5/7 09:38:17
               "really big scores" (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 5/7 08:09:04
               You are. If people are "being bad". This is a good - 90Tiger STL - 5/7 08:00:15
                    The predicted pickletonian response. - Tigrrrr! MU - 5/7 08:08:24
                         RE: The predicted pickletonian response. - El-ahrairah BAMA - 5/7 08:19:30
                              Hahahaha - Tigrrrr! MU - 5/7 08:21:43
                         There are times I'm not happy to be correct. (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 5/7 08:10:43
                              lol(nm) - cnk ATL - 5/7 08:29:27




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard