Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

RE: You think that doesn't exist? What are you fighting

Posted on: April 30, 2020 at 13:39:20 CT
MrBlueSky MU
Posts:
48578
Member For:
20.45 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3004550/

Experimental results showed that when droplets spread onto a person face-to-face over short distances, 92.3% to 99.5% of droplets were blocked by the front surface of the facemask, whereas only 0.5% to 7.7% of droplets reached the back of the facemask. Both facemasks A and B had near or over 99% protection efficiency, compared with that of 95.5% to 97% of surgical facemasks
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

so much for good faith, don't trust tigerinhogtown (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 4/30 12:39:31
     what did I do?(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 4/30 12:44:43
          RE: what did I do?(nm) - SwampTiger MU - 4/30 12:46:47
               sorry, done. thought yours was regarding the going into - tigerinhogtown STL - 4/30 12:54:19
                    thanks, it has fallen off the first page - SwampTiger MU - 4/30 12:57:07
          Told the truth. - MrBlueSky MU - 4/30 12:46:01
               What is the science on masks? (nm) - ummmm MU - 4/30 12:47:01
                    RE: What is the science on masks? (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 4/30 12:49:24
                         There's nothing about masks in either of those links. (nm) - ummmm MU - 4/30 12:53:29
                              Astute (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 4/30 12:55:11
                                   Well, is science guiding the decisions on masks or not? (nm) - ummmm MU - 4/30 12:57:34
                                        Of course. I really don't understand what you're - MrBlueSky MU - 4/30 13:16:46
                                             Link? Last I saw there is no "science" behind the efficacy - ummmm MU - 4/30 13:18:28
                                                  I still don't know why you're like this. - MrBlueSky MU - 4/30 13:19:31
                                                       "surgical masks" * - ummmm MU - 4/30 13:20:17
                         asymptomatic spread isn't the question (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 4/30 12:52:05
                              That's the argument for wearing a mask - MrBlueSky MU - 4/30 12:53:40
                                   so show the science that wearing a mask reduces spread (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 4/30 12:58:00
                                        You think that doesn't exist? What are you fighting - MrBlueSky MU - 4/30 13:16:25
                                             RE: You think that doesn't exist? What are you fighting - SwampTiger MU - 4/30 13:36:50
                                                  RE: You think that doesn't exist? What are you fighting - MrBlueSky MU - 4/30 13:39:20
                                                       I will stipulate that fitted surgical masks with exhaust - SwampTiger MU - 4/30 13:51:31
                                             A lot of people (probably most) aren't wearing surgical - ummmm MU - 4/30 13:19:58
                                                  I'm wearing a homemade cloth mask with a PM2.5 filter - MrBlueSky MU - 4/30 13:21:42
                                                       You need to get on the horn with all these stores saying - ummmm MU - 4/30 13:28:12
                                                            A covering is beneficial, period. - MrBlueSky MU - 4/30 13:30:36
                                                                 That's not what that study says. (nm) - ummmm MU - 4/30 14:13:52
                                   So says who? (nm) - ummmm MU - 4/30 12:57:50
                    here we go - SwampTiger MU - 4/30 12:49:03




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard