 |
|
From what I remember of their interview, I was skeptical of
Posted on: April 29, 2020 at 08:43:47 CT
JeffB MU
Posts:
72409
Member For:
21.47 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
a few of the things they said, but censorship seems over the top and the official response should give far more detail of what they disagree with and why.
This rather vague statement just doesn't cut the mustard:
"These reckless and untested musings do not speak for medical societies and are inconsistent with current science and epidemiology regarding COVID-19."
They should easily be able to spell out which of their musings were inconsistent with science and epidemiology and then give details on what science said that contradicted their musings, along with the links to the studies that refuted them.
This rather vague statement just doesn't cut the mustard:
"These reckless and untested musings do not speak for medical societies and are inconsistent with current science and epidemiology regarding COVID-19."
They should easily be able to spell out which of their musings were inconsistent with science and epidemiology and then give details on what science said that contradicted their musings, along with the links to the studies that refuted them.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
From what I remember of their interview, I was skeptical of - JeffB MU - 4/29 08:43:47