No, this is a classic example of your misunderstanding of

Posted on: February 17, 2020 at 21:53:19 CT

the argument at hand.

You & Ashtray were calling me a liberal for saying that harassing robocalls should be outlawed in this thread you hijacked:

http://www.tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=16766359
I replied to Ashtray that he was conflating anarchy with conservativism, but in fact BOTH conservatives AND liberals are in favor of at least some government laws and regulations.

You and he disputed that, of course.

My original post in this thread was a reply to your flawed line of reasoning using the time honored tactic of logicians, reductio ad absurdum. I gave an example that showed the absurdity of the assertion you two were making... that someone who feels the government should have a law against something is thereby automatically a liberal.

http://www.tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=16766457

It seems that the problem here is that neither of you sees the absurdity of that assertion (because in fact many/most conservatives would be in favor of laws &/or regulations of making porn films in a public library during business hours) because you are instead arguing against the conservatives (& probably more than a few liberals as well) who think that should be illegal.

Sorry, I guess I should have dumbed the argument down a little for you so that you could understand it.