Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Exaclty what it is - please note something here - not once

Posted on: January 29, 2020 at 10:53:37 CT
raskolnikov MU
Posts:
188057
Member For:
24.79 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
do I or have I chased down one of, let alone nearly all of your posts to laud on commentary regarding emotionalism. I claim that Trump broke laws or commited fraud - both facts and yet you stumble in and exhort over and over how 'emotional' such factual comment are.

Weird huh? I don't chase your comments ever. You chase mine all the time.

And you say I am emotional. That is some funny sht there.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Blumpf is right, it will never be enough for the dems - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/29 10:01:17
     Dems have become flyover territory. Nm - yy4u MU - 1/29 10:08:47
     It was and is the Impeachment of the Pres Don Trump - raskolnikov MU - 1/29 10:05:25
          Didnt you say the Russians stole the election from TheHag - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:09:30
               No, I never said that - raskolnikov MU - 1/29 10:43:41
                    Liar. Mueller said he found no evidence of any member - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:48:18
                         That is an utter lie. - raskolnikov MU - 1/29 10:57:59
                              Lol. So he found insufficient evidence? Goddam you are - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 11:01:15
               Over and over and over again - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:11:00
                    RE: Over and over and over again - raskolnikov MU - 1/29 10:44:32
                    He's a dishonest pos partisan hack (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:11:32
                         He's a silly little man - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:13:58
                              Why are you so emotionally driven re:some anonymous poster(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 1/29 10:45:40
                                   It is not an emotional assessment - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:48:26
                                        Exaclty what it is - please note something here - not once - raskolnikov MU - 1/29 10:53:37
     They may full well know some dems are going to see it as - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:03:46
          This. If this becomes the new standard for impeachment... - JayRoy KC - 1/29 10:07:52
               no, the new standard is - ashtray UF - 1/29 10:10:35
                    The new standard is this doesn't need to... - JayRoy KC - 1/29 10:20:36
                         thanks for your nonsensical opinion - ashtray UF - 1/29 10:21:57
                              You should know all about opinion because... - JayRoy KC - 1/29 10:23:56
                                   just like your heroes have against Biden - ashtray UF - 1/29 10:25:05
                                        So you’ve chosen to ignore the Transcript and now... - JayRoy KC - 1/29 10:32:02
                                             LOL, you're so fcking dumb it's comical - ashtray UF - 1/29 10:32:59
                                                  Libs and morons always post like, you. You don’t even - hokie VT - 1/29 10:51:32
                                                       he has no position except that he's retarded - ashtray UF - 1/29 12:39:11
                                                  Not dumb, more...a believer in Occam’s Razor. Tell me... - JayRoy KC - 1/29 10:42:57
                                                       LOL - ashtray UF - 1/29 12:39:58
     Pre-ordained? - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 10:03:10
          Then why wasn't he impeached for committing a crime - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/29 10:13:55
               Read below - it's funny - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:14:37
                    I can only read so much of Blue's stupidity each day - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/29 10:21:54
          Then why wasn't there an article of impeachment - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:04:36
               They did not, in part because of POTUS' obstruction (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 10:07:35
                    and in part because Democrats are incompetent (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/29 10:09:49
                    LOL - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:09:26
                         what would you call blocking congressional subpoenas - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 10:10:09
                              No they have not - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:12:24
                                   Obama claimed executive privilege. Trump hasn't done that - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 10:12:52
                                        Had they pushed it that would have been the claim - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:14:58
                                             Trump has never invoked executive privilege - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 10:17:23
                                                  The House never went to that point - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:18:49
                                                       Subpoenas issued....subpoenas ignored...articles of - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 10:21:48
                                                            In the courts where executive privilege would have been - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:26:51
                                                                 Executive privilege was not invoked by Trump - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 10:29:30
                                                                      Nobody said it was. The Dems waved the white flag before - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:31:50
                                                                           He truly does not get anything beyond some talking points he - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:32:41
                                                                                Not at all. I understand how the process works and it was - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 10:33:32
                                                                                     It worked as intended - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:34:20
                                                                      It didn't need to be - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:30:36
                                                                           they didn't give up, they drafted articles of impeachment - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 10:32:56
                                                                                Lol. And how is that going? (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:35:34
                                                                                     if the Trump party hadn't taken over the GOP - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 11:02:59
                                                                                          If your aunt had balls she would be your uncle. Whaaaaa!(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 11:05:36
                                                                                               for someone who claims to despise Trump - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 11:07:54
                                                                                You asked why there was no Executive Privilege asserted - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:35:17
                                                            Rush to impeach instead of going to court to prove their - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:24:08
                                                                 Yep - but he has no clue - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:27:38
                                                  Nancy never had the house vote on giving the committees - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:18:39
                                                       He just keeps digging - and looking worse and worse - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:19:14
                                                            RE: He just keeps digging - and looking worse and worse - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 10:22:56
                                                                 Who said they can't? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:27:58
                                                                 Where does it say they have to? Elections have consequences. - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:25:21
                                                                      trials regularly have witnesses (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 10:25:58
                                                                           So? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:28:21
                                                                           Answer the question. Where does it say they have to?(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:27:33
                                                                                The same place where it says they don't have to (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 10:30:00
                                                                                     So what are you menstruating about then?(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:32:54
                                             He will now get emotional and call you names(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:16:23
                                                  All caps - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:17:19
                                                       Nah, that's rask(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:20:02
                                        Nancy never had the house vote on giving the committees - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:14:02
                              Why didnt the Dems take it to court to prove it didnt exist? - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:11:12
                                   Federal courts ruled on McGhan - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 10:12:13
                                        Didnt it get appealed?(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:12:57
                                             it was appealed and a 2nd judge upheld the 1st judge's - MrBlueSky MU - 1/29 10:18:13
                                                  Wasnt it appealed again and then the Dems gave up?(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:19:24
                                                       yes, it was appealed again - ashtray UF - 1/29 10:20:12
                                                            So, the Dems could've dug in, passed the necessary - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:21:55
                                                                 yes, they could have (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/29 10:23:28
                                                                      But instead just wanted to hang impeachment on their - hefeweizen MU - 1/29 10:26:50
                                                                           I don't know, but that sounds like Democrats - ashtray UF - 1/29 10:28:42
               no, they didn't do their job - ashtray UF - 1/29 10:06:08
                    No, it doesn't - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:10:08
                         nobody said it is - ashtray UF - 1/29 10:11:33
                              Sure it does - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:13:34
                                   not at all - ashtray UF - 1/29 10:15:55
                                        They can fight the appearance of the witness - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:18:01
                                             but they can't stop the subpoena - ashtray UF - 1/29 10:18:22
                                                  And they may be able to compel testimony - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:20:02
                                                       I didn't say he was (nm) - ashtray UF - 1/29 10:20:55
                                                            You complained he blocked testimony - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/29 10:31:51
                                                                 you missed the point entirely - ashtray UF - 1/29 12:38:08




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard