Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

The opinions carry no binding weight or authority whatsoever

Posted on: January 16, 2020 at 10:14:53 CT
Ragnar Danneskjold MU
Posts:
81634
Member For:
20.21 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
The arguments contained within can be adopted by Courts, which would then grant them binding authority.

On their own they have neither.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Here is the full GAO opinion - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/16 09:38:46
     Supreme Court rulings are also opinions - ummmm MU - 1/16 09:43:25
          with legal authority and binding - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/16 10:01:24
               They're as binding as lower courts and subsequent - ummmm MU - 1/16 10:10:24
                    No, they are not legally binding in any way - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/16 10:16:09
                         I didn't say anything about legal standing. - ummmm MU - 1/16 10:19:41
                              It means they carry any weight from the standpoint of - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/16 10:21:49
                                   Oh okay, well weight is a different thing than standing. - ummmm MU - 1/16 10:51:54
                                   lol here’s a good read for you - pickle MU - 1/16 10:28:56
                    The opinions carry no binding weight or authority whatsoever - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/16 10:14:53
                         I agree. (nm) - ummmm MU - 1/16 10:19:01
          But they have legal standing - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/16 09:55:34
               No - eatatjoes MU - 1/16 10:02:11
                    No actually 4Tigs is exactly right - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/16 10:03:03
                         If that was your entire point - eatatjoes MU - 1/16 10:45:52
                              No one said it wouldn't have impact - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/16 10:47:39
                                   Define "legal standing" - eatatjoes MU - 1/16 11:09:55
                                        No - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/16 13:11:11
                         The Doors were right - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/16 10:03:45
               and still an opinion, nonetheless - ashtray UF - 1/16 10:00:20
                    Legally, they are not - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 1/16 10:03:28
                         More meaningful than Amateur Attorneys such as yourself - Ace AU - 1/16 10:06:48
          😂 - Ace AU - 1/16 09:53:53
               don't pretend you're on ummmmm's side. you're an - dangertim MU - 1/16 10:34:23
          Indeed(nm) - eatatjoes MU - 1/16 09:44:58
     RE: Here is the full GAO opinion: I read it and wondered - BH O'bonga MU - 1/16 09:42:30




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard