Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Oh the Reuters article? Yeah, none of that was believable.

Posted on: January 5, 2020 at 13:06:45 CT
ummmm MU
Posts:
44901
Member For:
13.38 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
You did a pretty good job seeing through this stuff when it came to Russia/Ukraine and Trump. Why the change now?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Schiff - Ace AU - 1/5 12:04:16
     Schiff LOL. What a deceitful crook. - johncoffey MU - 1/5 13:43:01
     You just posted the words of a proven liar as truth. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/5 12:07:14
          Schiff, a proven liar: Schiff can never again be taken - BH O'bonga MU - 1/5 13:35:09
          You assume Ace Hole posted accurately, honestly and - hokie VT - 1/5 13:00:48
               I assume he post to the best of his ability. When you - DHighlander NWMSU - 1/5 13:06:21
          Don't worry, Schiff will be right for once - Sal MU - 1/5 12:41:38
          would you say Schiff triggers you more than HRC or - Ace AU - 1/5 12:38:20
               That's irrelevant to his well made point. - MizzouTigerz MU - 1/5 13:05:38
                    Schiff Truth —> Trump Impeached - Ace AU - 1/5 13:15:02
                         Well of course. Trump Impeachment was stopped mid process - MizzouTigerz MU - 1/5 13:23:14
                              Trump Impeached - Ace AU - 1/5 13:34:02
                                   Repeating your lies doesn't turn it into truth. - MizzouTigerz MU - 1/5 13:43:01
                                        A fool like you, a supposed Attorney, does not understand - Ace AU - 1/5 13:46:51
          There was no imminent threat - mizzoumurfkc KC - 1/5 12:27:32
               He showed imminent threat - Sal MU - 1/5 12:35:28
                    Those events are not imminent threats, Einsal - mizzoumurfkc KC - 1/5 12:50:45
                    RE: He showed imminent threat - sarasotatiger MU - 1/5 12:43:47
                         "an escalation would not have happened" - Sal MU - 1/5 12:46:20
                              He said “should not”. - Mo Texan MU - 1/5 12:53:56
                                   And I also don't think this will have - Sal MU - 1/5 12:56:22
                                   Gotcha ... my mistake (nm) - Sal MU - 1/5 12:54:39
                    Do you have evidence of that? - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:36:29
                         It's been linked ad nauseam on this board - Sal MU - 1/5 12:38:30
                              No it hasn’t (nm) - pickle MU - 1/5 15:04:59
                              Can you link it for me? Are you talking about the govt - ummmm MU - 1/5 12:44:42
                                   Sure - Sal MU - 1/5 12:48:39
                                        I'm just asking you to link the posts with the evidence - ummmm MU - 1/5 12:53:52
                                             I never said "today" - Sal MU - 1/5 12:55:43
                                                  Then from any day. Can you link it for me? (nm) - ummmm MU - 1/5 12:57:07
                                                       You responded to one of them yesterday - Sal MU - 1/5 13:01:22
                                                            So all Intel is government sourced? - ashtray UF - 1/5 13:07:31
                                                                 What sources would you believe? (nm) - Sal MU - 1/5 13:11:58
                                                                      Anyone credible - ashtray UF - 1/5 13:30:35
                                                            Oh the Reuters article? Yeah, none of that was believable. - ummmm MU - 1/5 13:06:45
                                                                 Because he is r vs d(nm) - meatiger MU - 1/5 13:35:58
                                                                 Seeing through what stuff? - Sal MU - 1/5 13:11:38
                                                                      So why are you all for it now without evidence? (nm) - pickle MU - 1/5 15:08:01
                                                                      Fake news. (nm) - ummmm MU - 1/5 13:12:09
                                                                           Can you be more specific? (nm) - Sal MU - 1/5 13:12:54
                                                                                Untrue war propaganda. (nm) - ummmm MU - 1/5 13:13:31
                                                                                     Ok, then again I ask - Sal MU - 1/5 13:16:01
                                                                                          I don't know, and I don't care. - ummmm MU - 1/5 13:18:41
                                                                 Partisanship - ashtray UF - 1/5 13:08:28
                              No evidence has been linked on this board - ashtray UF - 1/5 12:43:45
                                   No, my partisanship would be if I agreed - Sal MU - 1/5 12:47:35
                                        you said before it was ok - meatiger MU - 1/5 13:37:49
                                        Could have been a number of organizations - ashtray UF - 1/5 13:09:31
                                             It wouldn't make much sense to go after - Sal MU - 1/5 13:12:32
                                                  Of course it would - pickle MU - 1/5 15:11:51
                                                  Sure it would - ashtray UF - 1/5 13:32:59
               His ego(nm) - Toger STL - 1/5 12:28:22
          If bin laden was killed 9/10/01 would 911 attacks continued? - Mo Texan MU - 1/5 12:25:11
               RE: If bin laden was killed 9/10/01 would 911 attacks continued? - MizzouTigerz MU - 1/5 13:12:44
                    RE: If bin laden was killed 9/10/01 would 911 attacks continued? - sarasotatiger MU - 1/5 13:57:43




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard