 |
|
It has been managed fine - had the president not obstructed
Posted on: December 19, 2019 at 11:20:11 CT
raskolnikov MU
Posts:
188057
Member For:
24.78 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
the efforts of the House at every turn, they would have been able to have had all the docs and testimony by folks like Mulvaney, Perry and Bolton done and in the books by now. Had they not "rushed it", the nation would have seen court verdicts followed by appeals followed by court verdicts and appeals for months if not years. And THAT would have simply been to get testimony.
The "rush" is nothing but a counter or response to Trump's stonewall. That is the same reason that Mueller opted NOT to drag things like this into the courts. Process would go on forever. THAT is the Trump way, stonewall, obstruct, appeal, stonewall, obstruct, appeal.
The Rushed job you claim is on Trump. Pelosie sd we are not playing that game. Had they gone the other route - in October of an election year, you could well have had impeachment on 5-7 counts. Would you hav preferred that.
The "rush" is nothing but a counter or response to Trump's stonewall. That is the same reason that Mueller opted NOT to drag things like this into the courts. Process would go on forever. THAT is the Trump way, stonewall, obstruct, appeal, stonewall, obstruct, appeal.
The Rushed job you claim is on Trump. Pelosie sd we are not playing that game. Had they gone the other route - in October of an election year, you could well have had impeachment on 5-7 counts. Would you hav preferred that.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
It has been managed fine - had the president not obstructed - raskolnikov MU - 12/19 11:20:11