 |
|
Why not both?
Posted on: November 17, 2019 at 13:09:50 CT
Mormad MU
Posts:
56694
Member For:
18.71 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Here's an example - a couple of them actually:
There was a play yesterday where KB wound up missing AO on a crossing route. The play call was fine, but the O-line didn't maintain blocking beyond the initial surge and Bryant had to throw it a click early before AO could come clean, which he did eventually. Result, incomplete pass. When you watched the replay, the linemen had good initial contact and then just kind of meandered around like drunks on a parking lot. Bad effort.
Another play, KB ran a QB draw. He took off too early before the D committed to flowing left (he ran right) and the Defender just adjusted back and stopped him short. Play call was fine. Execution was bad because KB was too quick to run.
There was a play yesterday where KB wound up missing AO on a crossing route. The play call was fine, but the O-line didn't maintain blocking beyond the initial surge and Bryant had to throw it a click early before AO could come clean, which he did eventually. Result, incomplete pass. When you watched the replay, the linemen had good initial contact and then just kind of meandered around like drunks on a parking lot. Bad effort.
Another play, KB ran a QB draw. He took off too early before the D committed to flowing left (he ran right) and the Defender just adjusted back and stopped him short. Play call was fine. Execution was bad because KB was too quick to run.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Exactly. We "should have" certainly beat Wyoming, Vandy and - North co-co champs MU - 11/17 16:34:50
- RE: Then you haven't watched a single game. He overthrows, under - sarasotatiger MU - 11/17 15:52:06Why not both? - Mormad MU - 11/17 13:09:50