We disagree. We need a "jerk" in the WH if a jerk is someon
Posted on: November 8, 2019 at 10:34:01 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
67927
Member For:
9.61 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
who is not presidential as the libs expect R presidents to be. That being someone who wants to curry favor with then people who hate him. The people who want to weaken our country. Being presidential means being a Bush. Just take it. Don't respond. Don't get angry. Don't fight back, it's not presidential.
Someone who calls out the media as liars, propagandists and enemies of america.
Someone who tells nato "allies" to pay their share. Not their "fair share" as defined by socialists, but the amount they agreed to pay.
Someone who will not get pushed around by the haircut in north korea or the the muzz-scum in iran.
Someone who recognizes that the climate accords are just more socialism designed to redistribute america's wealth around the world.
Someone who wants to make it easier for businesses to start and keep going.
Someone who believes the people can do more with their money than the government can.
Someone who wants america to take care of americans first. Even before mexicans, somalis and any other third worlders who want to live here off the toil of american citizens.
He's not presidential. Good.
I like the jerk, or i like what the jerk is doing. I don't have to like him personally.