Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

shameful ...

Posted on: October 22, 2019 at 12:34:39 CT
tmcats KSU
Posts:
39588
Member For:
25.50 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
democrats are following a secret impeachment process that's designed to fit their needs not the constitution, which itself is very broad in language about the subject. precedent, however, is clear that these proceedings be transparent. some of us are old enough to remember nixon. the process was initiated when the full house voted a resolution to give the judiciary committee authority to proceed. today's process is a disgusting sham.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

"The House’s decision of whether to impeach a judge is - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/22 12:29:43
     A fish is somewhat analagous to a monkey because they both - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/22 12:45:04
          don't take my word for it - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/22 12:48:58
               I'm not taking anybody's word for it - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/22 12:50:23
                    RE: I'm not taking anybody's word for it - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/22 12:51:35
                         You guys just aren't very bright - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/22 12:55:19
                              RE: You guys just aren't very bright - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/22 13:04:26
                                   RE: You guys just aren't very bright - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/22 13:06:23
     shameful ... - tmcats KSU - 10/22 12:34:39
          ignorance (nm) - pickle MU - 10/22 12:51:16
          No vote is required per the rules - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/22 12:45:49
               Nor have impeachments always begun with full vote - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/22 12:47:06
                    where's the resolution passed by the house?(nm) - tmcats KSU - 10/22 12:48:29
                         there doesn’t need to be one (nm) - pickle MU - 10/22 12:51:38
                         " In the past, House committees, under their general - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/22 12:49:43
                              Link the entire article(nm) - tman MU - 10/22 12:50:23
                                   already have - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/22 12:51:00
                                        There is a good NYT article on if the Repubs actions are - tman MU - 10/22 13:11:07
                                             ok - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/22 13:15:19
                                                  Don't bother educating yourself. It isn't a one sided - tman MU - 10/22 13:29:28
                                                       I'd rather research the actual house rules - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/22 13:36:26
                         Not even a requirement (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 10/22 12:49:19
                              nor historically unprecedented (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/22 12:50:05
                              precedent is the requirement(nm) - tmcats KSU - 10/22 12:49:57
                                   no it isn’t (nm) - pickle MU - 10/22 12:51:52
                                   " In the past, House committees, under their general - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/22 12:50:33
                                   Actually, the constitution is the requirement (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 10/22 12:50:25
          But some not old enough to remember much of it, - mizzoumurfkc KC - 10/22 12:39:15
          Nixon's impeachment started in the senate - MrBlueSky MU - 10/22 12:37:18
          Nixon investigation started in the Senate - ashtray UF - 10/22 12:36:06
               impeachment, dumb ass, impeachment(nm) - tmcats KSU - 10/22 12:36:54
                    They can't get their heads around the difference(nm) - tman MU - 10/22 12:41:27
                         Impeachment hasn't happened yet. The house Intelligence - MrBlueSky MU - 10/22 12:44:23
                              it's called an impeachment inquiry(nm) - tmcats KSU - 10/22 12:46:18
                                   and it doesn't, and hasn't always, begun with a full vote(nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/22 12:47:52
                                   correct, gathering evidence to determine if it sufficient - MrBlueSky MU - 10/22 12:47:05
                         no, you really can't seem to - ashtray UF - 10/22 12:42:11
                              Clearly you have one, as you are a lib(nm) - tman MU - 10/22 12:43:01
                                   ok - ashtray UF - 10/22 12:44:00
                                        Yes you are. Problem is you don't even know you are a lib(nm) - tman MU - 10/22 12:45:56
                                             You're looking especially idiotic today, tman - MrBlueSky MU - 10/22 12:47:46
                                             please provide one single liberal policy I support - ashtray UF - 10/22 12:47:15
                    there hasn't been an impeachment yet, dumb ass - ashtray UF - 10/22 12:41:26
                         meaningless wordsmanship(nm) - tmcats KSU - 10/22 12:45:22
                              to your idiot camp, yes... - ashtray UF - 10/22 12:46:28
                                   you socialists should follow the constitutional precedent(nm) - tmcats KSU - 10/22 12:47:20
                                        good grief (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/22 13:03:52
                                        you communists should learn how to read (nm) - ashtray UF - 10/22 12:47:45
     Tigerboard Trumpers - MrBlueSky MU - 10/22 12:30:36
          Since when is a grand jury only made up of democrats? - Sal MU - 10/22 12:48:51
               that is not true - mgtiger MU - 10/22 15:08:42




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard