Welcome Guest

Which means Amalek's name was never blotted out. So either

Posted on: August 1, 2019 at 22:51:40 CT

Emmanuel Goldstein

Posts:

1701

Member For:

7.31 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

God failed to deliver what he said, or it is just the words of a man who cannot follow basic logic that if you record a name for others to read, you aren't blotting it out.

Especially in a later time someone, allegedly but not likely, Ezra still knows the name and writes it down again.

Edited by Emmanuel Goldstein at 23:00:05 on 08/01/19

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Exodus 17:14. Is God retarded or the man who wrote it? - Emmanuel Goldstein - 8/1 21:16:24

Hey, TigerMatt...How long are you suspended for? - DoltfromSTL MU - 8/1 21:38:37

Try full context.....Exodus 17:8-16 - Spanky KU - 8/1 21:35:56

You and your special books bring joy to this board during - Toger STL - 8/1 22:26:58

Is the name Amalek completely blotted out? If so, - Emmanuel Goldstein - 8/1 21:54:50

Context pains you.... - Spanky KU - 8/1 22:11:33

1 Chronicles 1:36.. oops there is Amalek again. - Emmanuel Goldstein - 8/1 22:24:21

Because?? - Spanky KU - 8/1 22:43:50

Which means Amalek's name was never blotted out. So either - Emmanuel Goldstein - 8/1 22:51:40

RE: Which means Amalek's name was never blotted out. So either - Spanky KU - 8/1 23:04:19

You are completely dishonest with your red herring which - Emmanuel Goldstein - 8/1 23:10:56

Learn context. It is a skill that will be needed to survive - Spanky KU - 8/1 23:46:13

Typical dishonest POS Christian. (nm) - Emmanuel Goldstein - 8/2 00:30:04

That's not what Exodus 17:14 says. Even in your Bible - Emmanuel Goldstein - 8/1 22:13:06

i showed you what Exodus 17:8-16 stated - Spanky KU - 8/1 22:44:51

So what? How was Amalek's name ever blotted out if - Emmanuel Goldstein - 8/1 22:52:25

RE: So what? How was Amalek's name ever blotted out if - Spanky KU - 8/1 23:04:29

Nice sh1tty Bible you are using that is altering the text.(nm) - Emmanuel Goldstein - 8/1 21:45:50

no alteration... context when using the entire passage - Spanky KU - 8/1 21:53:27

Context changes nothing. (nm) - Emmanuel Goldstein - 8/1 21:55:12

Sure it does. A guy God told Thou shalt not kill - Mormad MU - 8/1 22:03:52

Yes in that regard. I was focusing on God telling some one - Emmanuel Goldstein - 8/1 22:36:49

yes... thou shalt not murder - Spanky KU - 8/1 22:12:26

And where in the Bible does it say that? - Mormad MU - 8/1 22:20:35

The theme is carried throughout the Bible - Spanky KU - 8/1 22:45:48

No. Despite a literal reading - Mormad MU - 8/1 22:53:46

Thou shalt not commit murder - Spanky KU - 8/1 23:05:06

So, as long as it's legal, it's not "killing" - Mormad MU - 8/1 23:11:22

It was always “Thou shalt not commit murder” - Spanky KU - 8/1 23:48:25

Unless you are Moses, right? Exodus 2:11-14 - Emmanuel Goldstein - 8/2 00:50:31

Spanky is dishonest. (nm) - Emmanuel Goldstein - 8/1 23:12:43

Because it is Jewish mythology to claim divine support - Emmanuel Goldstein - 8/1 22:53:27

So that was the first known instance of the wave?(nm) - JG MU

- 8/1 21:37:45

look - this is a mythology that uses God being mad - 90Tiger STL - 8/1 21:26:19

OK whoever heard of Amalek? - JG MU

- 8/1 21:21:23

He's sure no XENU, am I right? - RHAYWORTH MU - 8/1 21:28:06

You singing and dancing morans sho stick together(nm) - JG MU

- 8/1 21:30:30