Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

I agree with this. However, "not peer reviewed" with no oth

Posted on: July 13, 2019 at 14:56:54 CT
90Tiger STL
Posts:
161149
Member For:
23.25 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
1
er response implies what I took exception with.

again, i never defended the publication, lol.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Finnish study finds ‘practically no’ evidence for man-made - Spanky KU - 7/13 13:20:40
     Climate Change Have Done A Miserable Job . . . - ScottsdaleTiger MU - 7/13 17:16:27
     Self published study sinks ships at Pearl Harbor - JG A - 7/13 16:22:42
          Corroborated by scientists in Japan - Spanky KU - 7/13 16:25:40
               Did you read the Japanese study? It was about cosmic rays - TigerMatt STL - 7/13 16:53:48
                    not completely accurate. This study provides an opportunity - Spanky KU - 7/13 17:15:52
                         Not really. The Finnish study makes claims that the models - TigerMatt STL - 7/13 17:35:26
               so that makes 3.01% of scientists that disagree now? - JG A - 7/13 16:28:41
                    and 97% with a financial interest in perpetuating the myth - Spanky KU - 7/13 16:54:57
                         and the other 3% have no financial interest? LOL(nm) - meatiger MU - 7/13 18:15:25
                         LOL Jesus you are stupid and dishonest Spanked - JG A - 7/13 18:11:38
                         Explain why anthropogenic climate change was theorized - TigerMatt STL - 7/13 16:56:44
                              They knew it would lead to Dem-Lib funding so the Libs could - Spanky KU - 7/13 17:17:27
                                   You're pathetically naive about how science works.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 7/13 17:36:24
                                        I grew up when the global cooling scare was - Spanky KU - 7/13 21:25:36
                              Xplain why it was theorized by the Club of Rome and others - Uncle Fester USMC - 7/13 17:04:22
     Whether right or not, that paper sure as hell didn't - GA Tiger MU - 7/13 15:51:31
          low clouds mainly control the global temperature, not man - Spanky KU - 7/13 16:03:44
               CO2 lowers cloud production.. now think about that for a - TigerMatt STL - 7/13 16:55:43
                    as do cosmic rays... - Spanky KU - 7/13 21:37:14
                    I learned something (nm) - DC Jayhawk KU - 7/13 20:46:52
               GAT's mind is made up. - Alferd Packer MU - 7/13 16:20:37
     Self published, not peer reviewed.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 7/13 13:26:44
          i trust peer scientists about as much as trust gvmt (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 13:46:23
               I would politely ask you to reconsider - DC Jayhawk KU - 7/13 20:34:08
               Lol - meatiger MU - 7/13 14:49:11
                    what bias is that? I think the finish study is garbage. Now - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 15:13:33
                         So you have been arguing - meatiger MU - 7/13 15:42:06
                              Attack people? no. Argue their position? yes (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 17:03:44
               Yep. They're as trustworthy as the folks funding them. - MIZ45 MU - 7/13 14:22:19
                    "but the scientific method!" ... is as sound as those - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 14:26:00
                         Which is why peer review is critical. (nm) - TigerMatt STL - 7/13 14:28:14
                              lol, yeah. and infallible (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 14:28:58
                                   What I have issues with are 1) government latching on - TigerMatt STL - 7/13 14:46:02
                                        ok? (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 14:49:53
                                   No one claims it is infallible. You're reasoning like a - TigerMatt STL - 7/13 14:37:50
                                        then what does "not peer reviewed" imply? It implies - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 14:45:39
                                             Not peer reviewed is highly indicative of an attempt to hide - TigerMatt STL - 7/13 14:51:03
                                                  I agree with this. However, "not peer reviewed" with no oth - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 14:56:54
                                        i did nothing of the sort, Matt. Your implication above is - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 14:43:00
                                             Lol.....no - meatiger MU - 7/13 14:51:46
                                                  lol, follow the thread. Is it your point that peer review - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 14:57:22
                                                       he never implied that, Jeff (nm) - pickle MU - 7/13 15:08:08
                                                            then what, exactly does this imply? - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 15:12:55
                                                                 fairly simple - meatiger MU - 7/13 15:44:37
                                                                      then why not just say that? what is the magic of peer - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 17:03:24
                                                                           You really don’t understand the science community - meatiger MU - 7/13 18:12:43
                                                                           The lack of peer review implies the authors do not want - TigerMatt STL - 7/13 17:38:24
                                                                                yeah, you said that and nobody argued it. (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 18:15:54
                                                       That was never implied nor is it true - meatiger MU - 7/13 15:02:42
                                                            So what is the point of Matt's response above? (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 15:12:31
                                                       Science never implies fact.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 7/13 15:00:56
                                                            Of course it doesn't. So what does peer reviewed imply, - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 15:11:52
                                                                 RE: Of course it doesn't. So what does peer reviewed imply, - meatiger MU - 7/13 15:14:10
                                                                      So it doesn't imply that it's fact. Does not being peer rev - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 15:17:00
                                                                           It makes it highly suspect - meatiger MU - 7/13 15:28:09
                                                                                No, the data and lack of rigor make it suspect. Peer - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 17:04:29
                                   straw man (nm) - pickle MU - 7/13 14:34:13
                                        RE: straw man (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 14:42:12
                                             it’s a straw man, 90 (nm) - pickle MU - 7/13 14:49:30
                                                  i care less than little about your unarticulated positions - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 14:50:23
                                                       i don’t care. your post was a straw man (nm) - pickle MU - 7/13 14:51:52
                                                            false. - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 14:58:06
                                                                 lol ok, Jeff (nm) - pickle MU - 7/13 15:07:45
                                                                      lol, ok, meat (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 15:12:09
               The model has worked pretty well for the past few hundred - TigerMatt STL - 7/13 13:49:25
                    the scientific community is a groupthink org. they rely on - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 13:51:12
                         It is actually the opposite. They are constantly testing - TigerMatt STL - 7/13 13:55:51
                              sometimes. largely yes, but not on the issue at hand. No. (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 13:56:45
                    "pretty well" isn't that great (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 13:50:04
                         Sure it is. Scientific advancement has been faster than - TigerMatt STL - 7/13 13:54:41
                              also, scientific advancement is on par with the acceleration - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 13:56:21
                                   Technology is due to scientific advancement, not the other - TigerMatt STL - 7/13 13:58:40
                                        you've lost your way here matt (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 13:59:26
                                             This one blurb from the study is extremely questionable - TigerMatt STL - 7/13 14:26:49
                                                  i'm not supporting the study, Matt. You're not following - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 14:28:41
                                                       Yes, you are flailing around to criticize how science works - TigerMatt STL - 7/13 14:33:30
                                                            RE: Yes, you are flailing around to criticize how science works - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 14:44:29
                                                            talk about a straw man. all i did here is question th - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 14:42:02
                              advancement isn't what's in question, Matt, and you know - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 13:55:33
                                   It's not my fault you don't understand the scientific model. - TigerMatt STL - 7/13 13:58:11
                                        You sound like a bible thumper implying that the Word of - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 14:00:42
                                        I understand the model. I'm talking about the human beings - 90Tiger STL - 7/13 13:59:48
          “Japanese researchers at the University of Kobe arrived at - Spanky KU - 7/13 13:38:36
               RE: “Japanese researchers at the University of Kobe arrived at - Ace AU - 7/13 13:41:15
                    RE: “Japanese researchers at the University of Kobe arrived at - Spanky KU - 7/13 15:06:14
          RE: Self published, not peer reviewed.(nm) - Ace AU - 7/13 13:28:56
               2 of which are nor(nm) - tman MU - 7/13 14:03:05
                    RE: 2 of which are nor(nm) - Ace AU - 7/13 14:14:49




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard