the users that you describe as "trolls" as a cheap way to discredit their opinions and contributions to the site.
The thread below about Sterk's mishandling of the Yolanda case is a legitimate discussion whether you like it or not. And if you read the replies you'll see there are many users who chose to engage in the discussion rather than lazily dismiss it as "trolling" because they disagreed. Here's a good example:
http://www.tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=16311629
If you want to call me a "negative nancy" for critical commentary, that's fine (I often call overly optimistic posters "sunshine pumpers")... but to dismiss someone's opinions as "trolling" is just lazy and intellectually dishonest. You're better than that.