Welcome Guest

The same amount of evidence that

Posted on: June 8, 2019 at 18:52:51 CT

JG MU

Posts:

255471

Member For:

21.51 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

127

you have that I'm wrong.
Except I can accurately point out that you obviously don't understand what is being said about neuroscience.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

JG.. how does this soul, which you say exists outside our - TigerMatt STL - 6/8 18:11:19

Via the mind - JG A - 6/8 18:21:07

What is the method of interface? We know an electrical - TigerMatt STL - 6/8 18:44:14

I dunno but - JG A - 6/8 18:45:41

Neuroscience - TigerMatt STL - 6/8 19:26:12

pure guesswork - JG A - 6/8 19:29:59

Based on observations from studies as opposed to woo woo - TigerMatt STL - 6/8 19:31:23

I can't make up the hypocrisy of you - JG A - 6/8 19:34:13

What evidence do you have supporting this belief? - TigerMatt STL - 6/8 18:47:49

The same amount of evidence that - JG A - 6/8 18:52:51

I don't need to have evidence proving you wrong. The - TigerMatt STL - 6/8 18:53:58

LOL uh huh - JG A - 6/8 19:02:51

That's how science and reasoning work. You make the - TigerMatt STL - 6/8 19:24:25

By definition - JG A - 6/8 19:32:48

Once you claim the supernatural interfaces with the natural - TigerMatt STL - 6/8 19:39:47

I'm certainly the most highly trained and knowledgable - JG A - 6/8 19:44:39

I have no doubt you think so, but you display no - TigerMatt STL - 6/8 19:46:45

Unlike you - JG A - 6/8 19:49:47

That would be wrong. Unlike you I want to hear supporting - TigerMatt STL - 6/8 19:51:55

No you don't - JG A - 6/8 19:52:56

What is shown in this thread is you commit the same - TigerMatt STL - 6/8 19:54:24

LOL no - JG A - 6/8 19:56:27

Still waiting for one shred of evidence to support your - TigerMatt STL - 6/8 20:02:50

hold your breath and stomp your foot - JG A - 6/8 20:29:02

You have none. (nm) - TigerMatt STL - 6/8 20:32:54

lmfao - "the spiritual world is not governed by science" - 90Tiger STL - 6/8 19:38:58

LOL once again that from someone who can't wrap his - JG A - 6/8 19:43:54

Strawman (nm) - TigerMatt STL - 6/8 19:47:22

NO it gets to the heart of the matter - JG A - 6/8 19:52:12

It is just typical JG. Use terminology no one else uses - TigerMatt STL - 6/8 19:55:50

I ummm showed you idiots were wrong on that - JG A - 6/8 19:58:04

One link.. wow. Again watch the next game. Let me - TigerMatt STL - 6/8 20:01:49

The word used by your fellow simpleton was NEVER - JG A - 6/8 20:28:37

explain how something outside the universe connect - 90Tiger STL - 6/8 18:24:04

I can't explain to you that 7 men on the ice is too many - JG A - 6/8 18:34:32

i love that you ignore 100+ years of hockey in favor - 90Tiger STL - 6/8 18:41:42

I love you can't admit you are wrong - JG A - 6/8 18:43:47

lol, just ..... lol (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 6/8 19:39:46

It is hilarious - JG A - 6/8 19:45:15

5 men on the ice can be too many as well. No one counts the - TigerMatt STL - 6/8 19:49:12

Yes it COULD be, but how many men on the ice is too many - JG A - 6/8 19:55:53

Yes 7 is too many on the ice. That is 100% factually - TigerMatt STL - 6/8 20:00:43

LOL and I proved that wrong as well - JG A - 6/8 20:50:50

One link from one guy doesn't make terminology a standard.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 6/8 22:11:51

HAHAHAHAHAA - JG A - 6/9 12:52:34

6 on 6 hockey.. right? You hear that term many times over - TigerMatt STL - 6/8 18:40:44

What is your problem with accuracy? - JG A - 6/8 18:41:51

MAGIC (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 6/8 18:13:12

RE: MAGIC (nm) - JG A - 6/8 18:20:40

I love how those who have absolutely no evidence mock - TigerMatt STL - 6/8 18:16:52

LOL like who would that be? - JG A - 6/8 18:19:57