Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

There was literally zero evidence

Posted on: May 21, 2019 at 12:07:29 CT
Sal CMSU
Posts:
229171
Member For:
22.00 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
provided in that article. You also apparently missed this little line ""These are facially valid legislative purposes, and it is not for the court to question whether the Committee’s actions are truly motivated by political considerations,".

Yes, a court should take that into consideration.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Merrick Garland's DC court of appeals - MrBlueSky MU - 5/21 09:37:10
     A good great test on if he would have made a good justice - TGR84 MU - 5/21 11:06:37
     If true, I suspect he will demonstrate his adherence to - None**** MU - 5/21 10:07:55
     It's going to the Supreme Court - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 5/21 09:57:54
          I do like how the lower court refused a stay while it was - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/21 10:06:34
     Was there a point to that? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 5/21 09:49:05
     Gorsuch’s SUPREME Court will overturn the decision - Spanky KU - 5/21 09:48:39
          SCOTUS has long granted vast authority - MrBlueSky MU - 5/21 09:52:10
               There is no oversight reason to see citizen Trump’s taxes - Spanky KU - 5/21 10:32:40
                    "Legislative matters" (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 5/21 10:34:46
                         What bill is under consideration for which the President's - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/21 10:55:16
                              campaign finance is one of about six(nm) - gmmm98 MU - 5/21 11:33:28
                                   If that were true they would have subpoenaed the records of - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/21 13:28:51
                                        To my knowledge, neither of their - gmmm98 MU - 5/21 19:18:21
                                   They need to have better "evidence" than the testimony - Sal KC - 5/21 11:42:35
                                        you're on the wrong side of a presumption(nm) - gmmm98 MU - 5/21 12:00:14
                         Wrong! No ‘legislative matter’ exists - Spanky KU - 5/21 10:36:12
                              You cannot say that was any certainty (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 5/21 10:38:32
                                   it shouldn't amaze me that you support this fishing - blake1771 KC - 5/21 11:53:19
                                   I believe that's the point he, and most of us, have been - Sal KC - 5/21 11:43:13
                                        especially documents that predate his Presidency - Spanky KU - 5/21 11:51:20
                                   That's why CONGRESS has to demonstrate the need to - Spanky KU - 5/21 11:27:30
                                   And you cannot say with any certainty that there is. - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/21 10:57:07
               Has the House shown any cause for requesting these documents - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/21 10:01:08
                    The house committee requesting these records - MrBlueSky MU - 5/21 10:02:08
                         "Legislative purposes" isn't a cause - Sal KC - 5/21 11:43:49
                         What purpose? They have the power to request them but it - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/21 10:04:17
                              Google it - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/21 10:29:38
                                   No the propaganda is out there. No legit reason was ever - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/21 10:52:59
                                        So you choose ignorance - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/21 11:22:55
                                             By all means show what legitimate evidence - Sal KC - 5/21 11:48:25
                                                  silly sal. - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/21 12:02:31
                                                       There was literally zero evidence - Sal KC - 5/21 12:07:29
                                                            it's not a fact issue - gmmm98 MU - 5/21 12:27:20
               Well since it's a political ploy they should overturn it. (nm) - Logan BAMA - 5/21 09:55:28
                    Can Trump's lawyers prove that? - MrBlueSky MU - 5/21 09:57:23
                         You think the burden is on Trump's lawyers? (nm) - Sal KC - 5/21 11:51:14
                         they dont need to prove it. The burden is on Congress - Spanky KU - 5/21 10:35:20
                         What legislative purpose? By the way ‘Get Trump’ is NOT a - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/21 10:02:48
                         That's a ridiculous reach on their part since - Logan BAMA - 5/21 09:59:35
     Garland can get even, show POTUS who’s the - hokie VT - 5/21 09:40:04




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard