Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Yep! All democrats I'm sure!

Posted on: May 6, 2019 at 13:09:42 CT
kcnorthside KC
Posts:
5800
Member For:
12.48 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Among the high-profile signers are Bill Weld, a former U.S. attorney and Justice Department official in the Reagan administration who is running against Trump as a Republican; Donald Ayer, a former deputy attorney general in the George H.W. Bush Administration; John S. Martin, a former U.S. attorney and federal judge appointed to his posts by two Republican presidents; Paul Rosenzweig, who served as senior counsel to independent counsel Kenneth W. Starr; and Jeffrey Harris, who worked as the principal assistant to Rudolph W. Giuliani when he was at the Justice Department in the Reagan administration.

The list also includes more than 20 former U.S. attorneys and more than 100 people with at least 20 years of service at the Justice Department — most of them former career officials. The signers worked in every presidential administration since that of Dwight D. Eisenhower.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

No Collusion! No...Obstruction? - kcnorthside KC - 5/6 12:47:33
     They're all former prosecutors for a reason... - Logan BAMA - 5/6 14:51:40
     RE: No Collusion! No...Obstruction? - scan MU - 5/6 14:04:57
     I'll let you indict a sitting President if you'll let me: - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 5/6 13:55:22
     Correct. nm. - MUTGR MU - 5/6 13:53:47
     So Mueller was wrong? (nm) - Sal KC - 5/6 13:34:29
          He was wrong to not subpoena Trump, I'd say. - kcnorthside KC - 5/6 13:58:03
               That is not what the report said (nm) - Sal KC - 5/6 14:11:38
          What is that even supposed to mean?(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 5/6 13:43:15
               Mueller punted on obstruction and listed - Sal KC - 5/6 14:15:14
               Mueller didn't think he could convict on obstruction(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 5/6 13:45:04
                    Mueller essentially stated in his report - Sal KC - 5/6 14:16:18
     RE: No Collusion! No...Obstruction? - Tigrrrr! MU - 5/6 13:25:52
     And hundreds disagree--what about conspiracy to collude - mu7176grad MU - 5/6 13:18:28
          I don't see your link backing up that hundreds disagree - playhard KC - 5/6 13:50:59
               Give me a break clown - mu7176grad MU - 5/6 14:13:19
                    So you're not going to provide a link - playhard KC - 5/6 14:46:17
                         Prove the crime then indict - mu7176grad MU - 5/6 15:10:09
          Or perhaps his entire career has revolved around - JG A - 5/6 13:19:40
               lol yes! fire can't melt steel!!(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 5/6 13:25:54
                    What do you mean with this phrase I never said? - JG A - 5/6 13:31:24
                         thermite midgets(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 5/6 13:40:17
                              My mother in law said there were too many people - JG A - 5/6 13:58:55
               You know could be---hard to believe anyone now - mu7176grad MU - 5/6 13:23:32
     You clown. What if he even TRIED to obstruct but - GA Tiger MU - 5/6 13:15:46
          Then he is guilty , GAT- duh* - JG A - 5/6 13:18:11
               You caint obstruct a make believe investigation into - Uncle Fester USMC - 5/6 13:22:31
                    A True Conservative mind works in wondrous ways - GA Tiger MU - 5/6 15:37:04
                         Thanks. Clear logic is foreign to many of you - JG A - 5/6 15:48:43
                              And certainly foreign to those who won't - GA Tiger MU - 5/6 16:01:30
                                   LOL Jesus you senile simpleton - JG A - 5/6 20:06:30
     obvious Collusion! Slam Dunk Obstruction - JG A - 5/6 13:07:26
          evidence... oh yes forgot that part. Lol - MizzouGunner MU - 5/6 15:42:17
          Still got them no collusion, no obstruction blues...nm - MUTGR MU - 5/6 13:59:45
          RE: obvious Collusion! Slam Dunk Obstruction - MOCO SON MU - 5/6 13:24:51
          Obvious Coup Supporting and Slam Dunk America Hating - Uncle Fester USMC - 5/6 13:12:54
               Man do I nail it! - JG A - 5/6 13:15:59
                    Alex, what is a phrase JG's never used with a woman? - RHAYWORTH MU - 5/6 13:26:38
                    Five words that JG's wife never sez for eleventy Bazillion - Uncle Fester USMC - 5/6 13:18:42
                         I know! - JG A - 5/6 13:20:59
                              58 - Uncle Fester USMC - 5/6 13:23:27
          ^^^TDS on steroids... - Logan BAMA - 5/6 13:09:58
               ^^^^ RDD - JG A - 5/6 13:11:58
                    I"ve already diagnosed you. You're not - Logan BAMA - 5/6 13:15:09
                         The difference being I realize these made up - JG A - 5/6 13:17:20
                              Your need to have the last word says - Logan BAMA - 5/6 13:20:55
     Why you would trust the Washington Compost is beyond - Logan BAMA - 5/6 12:58:33
     LOL - mizzouSECedes STL - 5/6 12:58:05
          So all 380 of these former federal prosecutors are - MrBlueSky MU - 5/6 13:07:28
               Yep! All democrats I'm sure! - kcnorthside KC - 5/6 13:09:42
                    The article sets up a false premise - Sal KC - 5/6 13:40:06
               They're lawyers(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 5/6 13:09:16
                    Totally. What would they know about this that TB - kcnorthside KC - 5/6 13:10:23
                         lol that's not the point - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 5/6 13:11:37
          RE: LOL - kcnorthside KC - 5/6 12:59:04
               He could have fired Mueller - Sal KC - 5/6 13:37:18
               an investigation that never should have began(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 5/6 13:10:46
                    RE: an investigation that never should have began(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 5/6 13:12:52
                         Badird is a moron, this should have been a counter- - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 5/6 13:18:07
               Mulehead wasn't removed so it's moot. - Logan BAMA - 5/6 13:02:39
               That isn't obstruction (nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 5/6 13:02:33
                    RE: That isn't obstruction (nm) - kcnorthside KC - 5/6 13:08:23
                         The investigation was never impeded - Sal KC - 5/6 13:40:56
                              The investigation was never impeded thanks to - kcnorthside KC - 5/6 14:05:25
                         RE: That isn't obstruction (nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 5/6 13:12:04
                    RE: That isn't obstruction (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 5/6 13:07:10
                         The President can be impeached on charges - mizzouSECedes STL - 5/6 13:11:03
                              Mueller wimped out when he didn't subpoena Trump. - kcnorthside KC - 5/6 13:13:15
                                   So, you're ****ed that the Dems didn't get to - mizzouSECedes STL - 5/6 13:14:23
                                        No, more that Trump got to set a false narrative. - kcnorthside KC - 5/6 13:15:26
                                             His desires weren't carried out - mizzouSECedes STL - 5/6 13:16:57
                                                  There does not have to be a crime for obstruction to occur(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 5/6 13:25:11
                                                       You're right - mizzouSECedes STL - 5/6 13:38:06
                                                  Trying to break a law and being unsuccessful is still a - kcnorthside KC - 5/6 13:21:33
                                                       So, not breaking the law is a crime? (nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 5/6 13:37:00
                                                            Attempting to break the law is a crime, yes.(nm) - kcnorthside KC - 5/6 14:00:39
                                                                 No, it is a thoughtcrime (nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 5/6 14:51:32
                              What's being referenced in this thread - MrBlueSky MU - 5/6 13:12:18
                                   Impeachment is to bring forth charges against - mizzouSECedes STL - 5/6 13:13:42
                                        Impeachment is not a criminal charge (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 5/6 13:14:01
                                             Never said it was criminal (nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 5/6 13:14:42
               Not obstruction... none of Trump's actions would have ended - Spanky KU - 5/6 13:00:46
     RE: No Collusion! No...Obstruction? - MOCO SON MU - 5/6 12:54:42
     lol(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 5/6 12:54:32




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard