Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

So Mueller didn't really agree with barr's memo.

Posted on: April 30, 2019 at 21:23:54 CT
tigerdb MU
Posts:
58182
Member For:
24.35 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
The special counsel wrote that Barr's initial summary "did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this office's work and conclusions," according to the Post.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

lol Mueller wrote Barr a letter critical of his summary - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 4/30 19:05:51
     The collusion was obvious the obstruction a slam dunk - JG A - 4/30 19:31:06
          What statute covers collusion? - MizzouTigerz MU - 5/1 10:24:41
          Then why didn’t Mueller recommend charges? (nm) - Cubicle Clown USA - 5/1 06:36:52
          Whats obvious is yer head got slam dunked up agin some - Uncle Fester USMC - 4/30 19:55:12
          The sheet you believe - TIGERROAR MU - 4/30 19:52:38
          Fire can't melt steel, Hillary is guaranteed to win - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 4/30 19:49:58
               What are 3 things lied about JG for everything Alex? - JG A - 4/30 20:14:01
          Still got the no collusion, no obstruction blues I see. nm. - MUTGR MU - 4/30 19:44:25
               He's still waiting for full report release that was released - North co-co champs MU - 4/30 19:51:07
                    Yes, Barr is misleading everyone about a report everyone - MUTGR MU - 4/30 22:38:20
     Mueller agrees with Barr's letter but doesn't like media - North co-co champs MU - 4/30 19:22:48
          Mueller never agreed with barr's letter...you tards have - tigerdb MU - 4/30 21:07:18
               lol according to the report - Sal KC - 4/30 21:10:34
                    WTF are you talking about boy? Mueller never said that he - tigerdb MU - 4/30 21:19:21
                         He agreed it was accurate (nm) - Sal KC - 4/30 21:24:02
                              In what alternative universe did mueller agree that barr's - tigerdb MU - 4/30 21:29:11
                                   Sal is even one of the dimwits - mizzoumurfkc KC - 4/30 21:48:39
                                        It was factual - Sal KC - 4/30 21:49:35
                                             It certainly omitted some key facts from the Mueller report - tigerdb MU - 4/30 21:57:45
                                                  And in the end Mueller still didn't make a decision - Sal KC - 4/30 21:59:23
                                   he did, 7 minutes ago - dangertim MU - 4/30 21:33:32
                                        LOL - that's not an actual quote of Mueller. - tigerdb MU - 4/30 21:39:48
                                             It was an accurate summary - Sal KC - 4/30 21:41:53
                                                  If Mueller felt that it was an accurate summary, there would - tigerdb MU - 4/30 21:46:14
                                                       It wasn't supposed to capture the substance - Sal KC - 4/30 21:47:26
                                                            What the hell good is a summary that doesn't capture the - tigerdb MU - 4/30 21:53:24
                                                                 Barr didn't white wash anything related to obstruction - Sal KC - 4/30 22:11:27
                                                                      Muellers failing was not compelling Individual 1 to give a - tigerdb MU - 4/30 22:17:33
                                   He said it was accurate (nm) - Sal KC - 4/30 21:30:29
          It makes zero sense - Sal KC - 4/30 20:03:07
               Well of course. Its Wash Post/NY Times... the preferred - North co-co champs MU - 4/30 20:12:33
                    Yep, it's pretty convenient timing - Sal KC - 4/30 20:21:56
                         That too. LOL. As if there is more evidence not... - North co-co champs MU - 4/30 20:30:47
     Ha Muellee declined - mizzoumurfkc KC - 4/30 19:13:36
          Whoever said the summary was extensive? - Sal KC - 4/30 19:29:15
               You are really dumb, Sal - mizzoumurfkc KC - 4/30 19:32:17
                    Your post has zero logic to it (nm) - Sal KC - 4/30 19:59:50
                         What didn't you understand, Sal? - mizzoumurfkc KC - 4/30 20:12:36
                              You entire post makes zero sense - Sal KC - 4/30 20:22:40
                                   You've started here before that Mueller agreed with Barr's - mizzoumurfkc KC - 4/30 20:40:14
                                        Sal's really dumb. - tigerdb MU - 4/30 21:08:25
                                             Sal is a major buffoon - mizzoumurfkc KC - 4/30 21:14:42
                                                  So you can stop looking like an idiot - Sal KC - 4/30 21:16:20
                                                       So Mueller didn't really agree with barr's memo. - tigerdb MU - 4/30 21:23:54
                                                            He agreed it was accurate (nm) - Sal KC - 4/30 21:24:49
                                                                 No, he didn't. If Mueller had AGREED, there would not have - tigerdb MU - 4/30 21:36:49
                                                                      You really need to read - Sal KC - 4/30 21:38:49
                                                                           Per Barr. However that's not what Mueller actually said(nm) - tigerdb MU - 4/30 21:40:33
                                                                                This is Sal's usual schtick - mizzoumurfkc KC - 4/30 21:54:14
                                                                                     You two are engaging in a convenient argument - Sal KC - 4/30 21:57:48
                                                                                How do you know? (nm) - Sal KC - 4/30 21:41:08
                                                                                     We'll know when the report is released, I guess. - dangertim MU - 4/30 21:50:17
                                                                                          lol if only! (nm) - Sal KC - 4/30 21:50:58
                                             You two clearly haven't even read the report on the letter (nm) - Sal KC - 4/30 21:10:52
                                                  Show a link where Mueller stated that he agreed with the - tigerdb MU - 4/30 21:17:19
                                                       Mueller stated it was accurate - Sal KC - 4/30 21:22:55
                                                            LOL - no, that's barr's side of Mueller's statement to him - tigerdb MU - 4/30 21:35:44
                                                                 So we are only to believe part of the article? (nm) - Sal KC - 4/30 21:39:41
                                                                      If you believe the headline of the article (that mueller was - tigerdb MU - 4/30 21:54:54
                                                                           So we are only to believe the parts of the article - Sal KC - 4/30 21:56:43
                                                                                No - I realize that while Mueller may have indicated that - tigerdb MU - 4/30 22:00:50
                                                                                     Sal thinks Barr's 'summary' wasn't - mizzoumurfkc KC - 4/30 22:04:46
                                                                                          It wasn't meant to be a summary - Sal KC - 4/30 22:06:51
                                                                                     So again, we are only to believe certain parts - Sal KC - 4/30 22:03:39
                                                                 so Barr is now lying about the phone call? - dangertim MU - 4/30 21:39:00
                                                                      We know the Barr summary was accurate - Sal KC - 4/30 21:40:51
                                                       This should be good - mizzoumurfkc KC - 4/30 21:20:20
                                                            it's right above your post. laugh?(nm) - dangertim MU - 4/30 21:28:50
                                                                 LAUGH those weren't Mueller 's words - mizzoumurfkc KC - 4/30 21:44:50
                                                                      lol so now the report is inaccurate? (nm) - Sal KC - 4/30 21:45:52
                                                  Lol and with Ssl's usual schtick that - mizzoumurfkc KC - 4/30 21:17:05
                                        You should go back and read the unverified report - Sal KC - 4/30 20:42:47
          Indictments coming anyday now huh idiot? - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 4/30 19:15:18
               He really is dumb (nm) - Sal KC - 4/30 19:29:24
                    LAUGH sure Sal - mizzoumurfkc KC - 4/30 19:37:50
                         He's being kind (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 4/30 20:15:49
                              Oh look, the doc is back... - mizzoumurfkc KC - 4/30 20:25:18
                         What exactly do you think Mueller - Sal KC - 4/30 20:04:16
                    Muellertime aint goin to work for NASA anytime soon - Uncle Fester USMC - 4/30 19:36:14
               Fester's been saying indictments are coming... - mizzoumurfkc KC - 4/30 19:18:14
     The summary was obviously spot on (nm) - Sal KC - 4/30 19:06:30
          Mueller said it didn't reflect the "nuance" of his report - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 4/30 19:08:05
               In federal court never had a Judge say nuanced - mu7176grad MU - 4/30 19:19:00
               The summary wasn't a summary of the entire report - Sal KC - 4/30 19:08:38
                    Well Barr testifies tomorrow and Mueller won't be far - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 4/30 19:10:21
                         I'm not really sure what else Mueller can say - Sal KC - 4/30 19:12:42
                              I agree(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 4/30 19:13:22




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard