Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

I disagree, it was purposely included to provide Congress an

Posted on: April 18, 2019 at 17:49:09 CT
Mo Texan MU
Posts:
20130
Member For:
22.08 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
avenue to obtaining grand jury materials pursuant to the Rule 6(e) exception for disclosure to an impeachment inquiry if Congress so chooses. Not saying that will occur, but imo that was in part a reason to include the information
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Pretty great seeing this blow up in Barr's face(nm) - Danny Whizzbang USA - 4/18 17:09:16
     I agree! Bring more explosions on! I want more! - DoltfromSTL MU - 4/18 17:51:34
     This seems to fit your post the best. - RHAYWORTH MU - 4/18 17:49:52
     all the flailing and singing and dancing and delusions - JG A - 4/18 17:17:45
          You're really hitched your wagon to the wrong side on this - MUTGR MU - 4/18 17:35:04
               never doubt him - FootballRefugee MU - 4/18 18:10:52
               lol well it is JG - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 4/18 17:43:51
               The boundless energy of delusion - JG A - 4/18 17:38:39
          lol fire can't melt obstruction!! - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 4/18 17:23:00
     Think it's time you sat this one out champ - Calca STL - 4/18 17:17:42
     Trump just locked up 2020 in a landslide and you think - North co-co champs MU - 4/18 17:16:49
     Nothing Barr said was incorrect (nm) - Sal KC - 4/18 17:16:35
     Huh? - Logan BAMA - 4/18 17:12:54
     $hitlibs shreiking does not=anything blowing up in Barr's - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 4/18 17:12:24
     And now he's about to BREAK THE LAW, says Sal - MrBlueSky MU - 4/18 17:10:46
          ok Blue if you want a reminder of how big of a dumba$$ you - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 4/18 17:19:09
          Sal lives in fantasy land, at best Barr has been - playhard KC - 4/18 17:19:05
               What has he lied about? - Sal KC - 4/18 17:19:56
          It was a poorly written report to include GJ testimony. - Logan BAMA - 4/18 17:17:18
               I disagree, it was purposely included to provide Congress an - Mo Texan MU - 4/18 17:49:09
                    I disagree that it should be in the report... - Logan BAMA - 4/18 20:12:57
                         Evidence regardless of it’s source is always included in - Mo Texan MU - 4/18 20:53:02
                              No it isnt. Point to the statute supporting your position - tman MU - 4/18 21:01:40
                                   We’re talking about investigative reports are we not? (nm) - Mo Texan MU - 4/19 13:05:15
                    I thought in that ruling - Sal KC - 4/18 18:14:47
                         If you mean Mckeefer(sp?) it left this avenue open(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 4/18 19:05:17
          Lol did you not even read what you posted? (nm) - Sal KC - 4/18 17:16:09
               You've been saying for weeks - MrBlueSky MU - 4/18 17:20:13
                    No I haven't been saying that - Sal KC - 4/18 17:23:42
                    Link? only thing I've seen him say is if the GJ stuff - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 4/18 17:21:14
                         It literally says "reduced redactions" in Blue's post - Sal KC - 4/18 17:34:39
                              He and murf are straight morons lol(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 4/18 17:41:40
          LOCK HIM UP! - mizzoumurfkc KC - 4/18 17:14:39
               "reduced redactions" - Sal KC - 4/18 17:35:10
                    LAUGH...Sal you really need to - mizzoumurfkc KC - 4/18 18:29:39
          uh if he's leaving the GJ redactions how would he be - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 4/18 17:13:48
               another swing and miss for him (nm) - Sal KC - 4/18 17:18:03




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard