Welcome Guest

Not sure we are there yet but we shouldn't permanently take

Posted on: March 20, 2019 at 16:09:52 CT

Bulldog Bob Brown STL

Posts:

11157

Member For:

23.81 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

That option off the table.

I think a first course of action would be evaluate who is using AC in ways or in buildings that may not necessarily be most beneficial as a whole. Some tax methodology or restrictions on use based on new, common sense regulations seems a reasonable first step.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

In addition to being a detriment to the environment, people - ummmm MU - 3/20 15:53:28

energy consuption per person is pretty much unchanged - tigerinhogtown STL - 3/20 16:40:36

Same with people wearing clothes or building houses. - RHAYWORTH MU - 3/20 16:02:01

Enough is enough. (nm) - ummmm MU - 3/20 16:03:21

It must consume 20% or more of electric production - Bulldog Bob Brown STL - 3/20 16:01:18

I for one am willing to rape the environment and pillage the - hokie VT - 3/20 16:07:06

Forced relocation to milder climates? (nm) - ummmm MU - 3/20 16:03:53

Not sure we are there yet but we shouldn't permanently take - Bulldog Bob Brown STL - 3/20 16:09:52

I admit sometimes I can be a greed head - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/20 15:54:38

You probably should ask Rask if you have too much money - TIGERROAR MU - 3/20 15:56:33

Like emotions, it can be measured.(nm) - Toger STL - 3/20 15:55:49

The first step is admitting you are one. - ummmm MU - 3/20 15:55:48