RE: They are kind of a rich man's version of ku fans

Posted on: February 20, 2019 at 11:18:13 CT

Would a fan base that claims the existence of a clandestine program set up inside a conference that directs that league's men's basketball officials to call fewer fouls on one team's players and more fouls on that team's opponents in order to facilitate that team to win enough games to claim the championship of that league as an excuse for it's own losing record against that team, or that the National Collegiate Athletic Association has been infiltrated by a cadre of 'planted alumni' of a certain fan base, who have been set up to stonewall or thwart potential investigations into their men's basketball program, while 'unfairly targeting' the programs of their 'rivals', be defined as 'imbecillic'?

Could there be any fan base more 'imbecillic' than one that purports to believe in those things?

Does having a "sense of history" mean making up and spreading farcical, fraudulent claims and stories and deliberately fudging the facts about a particular basketball program's record of achievement?

Does a fan base whose men's basketball program has been put on probation three times since 1990 and claims 'we do things the right way' and 'what we did WAS NOT cheating' condone cheating?

Edited by BuckTurgidson at 11:37:48 on 02/20/19