 |
|
they're identical straw man positions introduced to
Posted on: February 14, 2019 at 20:59:41 CT
90Tiger STL
Posts:
163477
Member For:
23.37 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
1
argue rather than having an honest discussion.
When you posted earlier that "noone wants the border unprotected..."
It prompted me to think.
What do you want at the border? How do you decide which people to listen to in terms of what's required to ensure what level of security?
I don't think anyone who "supports the wall" wants a contiguous 2000 mile wall.
So - how about we drop the hyperbole and straw man arguments and agree on this:
I want the border secured and it's unclear what the proper mix of solutions will achieve that and it's ambiguous what "secured" means.
When you posted earlier that "noone wants the border unprotected..."
It prompted me to think.
What do you want at the border? How do you decide which people to listen to in terms of what's required to ensure what level of security?
I don't think anyone who "supports the wall" wants a contiguous 2000 mile wall.
So - how about we drop the hyperbole and straw man arguments and agree on this:
I want the border secured and it's unclear what the proper mix of solutions will achieve that and it's ambiguous what "secured" means.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
they're identical straw man positions introduced to - 90Tiger MU - 2/14 20:59:41